Template talk:Party

I was worried how we'd seperate these three groups, but this category does it perfectly. Simple works best I guess! Nice template. Scottch 05:36, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Playable and Drive.

Should we add "Playable" and/or "Drive" too?:

--Painocus

• Well, Drives aren't exactly Party Members or people that help you. They are just Sora, in different forms. But I do agree that a template should be made for drive forms, as each one is worthy of its own article instead of being merged with the Sora article.--Dreyfus 01:02, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
  • I think Dreyfus has a good idea. Scottch 08:12, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

The Org in Days

HarpieSiren - Here's one for all of us TALK - It will keep us connected Yes, they're playable in the non-canon multiplayer, and they seem to be party members in the main story. But putting them on the list of main playable characters clutters it up. So either leave them off, or add a new section for them. ETA: Yeah, the template is normal here, but all over the wiki it's the messed up one with everyone in multiplayer listed. How do we fix this?

D-Link Positions

I think we should place the D-Link positions properly once we know the time the characters become D-Links.--Charmed-Jay 20:30, December 2, 2009 (UTC)

Orgainization XIII also a party member?

Is Organization also a party member? I mean they did help Roxas in his misson like Axel, Xion, and other member. --Cococrash11 07:33, December 14, 2009 (UTC)Cococrash11

Can't you guys at least read or reply what I'm saying? --Cococrash11 22:08, December 19, 2009 (UTC)Cococrash11