Game talk:Sark: Difference between revisions
m (Talk:Sark (Boss) moved to Game talk:Sark) |
(→Why is he considered a "somebody"?: new section) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
So, shouldn't the name be changed? {{User:Organization 13/Sig}} 18:19, August 7, 2010 (UTC) | So, shouldn't the name be changed? {{User:Organization 13/Sig}} 18:19, August 7, 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Why is he considered a "somebody"? == | |||
My complaints about the term "somebody" in general aside, shouldn't Sark be considered a "Data" character? [[Special:Contributions/70.71.109.113|70.71.109.113]] 23:01, 24 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:01, 24 February 2012
Easily Defeated? Well, while it is true that Sark is easy to kill, I don't think is should mention how easy it is to beat him Because it seems a bit opinionated. PLus, it may be insulting to those who did find Sark difficult. Not that anybody does I am sure.(Bananaphone1996 21:34, June 4, 2010 (UTC)) (Bananaphone1996 07:37, June 3, 2010 (UTC))
Title
Why is the Character page called Sark, while the Boss page is called Commander Sark and the journal refers to him as Sark. 
Organization13 
12:02, June 20, 2010 (UTC)
Hello? Organization13 11:56, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
Anyone? Organization13 13:01, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
If the Journal just calls him Sark, the page should just be "Sark (Boss)".LapisLazuliScarab21:11, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
So, shouldn't the name be changed? Organization13 18:19, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
Why is he considered a "somebody"?
My complaints about the term "somebody" in general aside, shouldn't Sark be considered a "Data" character? 70.71.109.113 23:01, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
