Game talk:Sark

From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki: A world of information not accessible by Gummiship

Easily Defeated? Well, while it is true that Sark is easy to kill, I don't think is should mention how easy it is to beat him Because it seems a bit opinionated. PLus, it may be insulting to those who did find Sark difficult. Not that anybody does I am sure.(Bananaphone1996 21:34, June 4, 2010 (UTC)) (Bananaphone1996 07:37, June 3, 2010 (UTC))


Why is the Character page called Sark, while the Boss page is called Commander Sark and the journal refers to him as Sark. Org13left.png Organization13 Org13right.png 12:02, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

Hello? Org13left.png Organization13 Org13right.png 11:56, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

Anyone? Org13left.png Organization13 Org13right.png 13:01, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

If the Journal just calls him Sark, the page should just be "Sark (Boss)".LapisLazuliScarab21:11, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

So, shouldn't the name be changed? Org13left.png Organization13 Org13right.png 18:19, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Why is he considered a "somebody"?[edit]

My complaints about the term "somebody" in general aside, shouldn't Sark be considered a "Data" character? 23:01, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Though he may be made of data, he is a complete being- which is what technically constitutes a Somebody. And yes, I do think we need to change the term. --Item_2384.png AS IF! Item_2384.png 23:13, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Weren't we going to change it to "Other" or something?"We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 02:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
I've always been a fan of "Entelechy". Compared to the other options that have been suggested, I feel like it would work best. --Item_2384.png AS IF! Item_2384.png 02:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Mkay. Suggest it on the Enemy template talk so we can implement it, and away we go!"We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 03:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Okay, then instead of having No Heart as "Data" perhaps it would be better to have bosses like No Heart/Armor of the Master, Anti-Riku/Anti-Saix, Vivi, the Organization Data battles, etc., to be categorized as "Simulations" instead, to differentiate them a bit better from other digital guys like Data-Riku and Sark? 04:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Sounds good to me. maggosh 04:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Is Fake Vivi a simulation, though? I thought they made it clear it was a Dusk that had gotten into the system. Anti-Riku and Anti-Saix, too, I don't think we can mark them separately from their main forms. the others, Simulations is fine."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 07:40, 25 February 2012 (UTC)