|
|
Line 84: |
Line 84: |
| So far, there has been total, unanimous support (minus yourself) for electing more admins, and promoting BK to bureaucrat. It is clearly the community's consensus - can we now go ahead with it?}} | | So far, there has been total, unanimous support (minus yourself) for electing more admins, and promoting BK to bureaucrat. It is clearly the community's consensus - can we now go ahead with it?}} |
| {{Bluer|05:12, July 23, 2010 (UTC)|Please be patient, kupo, the discussion is only a day old, and only a select few from the community has given their opinions, kupo. If the community is aware of this and as engaged as I'm told, we'll have enough input for a consensus,}} | | {{Bluer|05:12, July 23, 2010 (UTC)|Please be patient, kupo, the discussion is only a day old, and only a select few from the community has given their opinions, kupo. If the community is aware of this and as engaged as I'm told, we'll have enough input for a consensus,}} |
| | {{BebopKate|time=20:22, July 24, 2010 (UTC)|text=Whew. I'm back, I'm back. Narnia is a strange and odd world...wait, wrong book. -_- Well, let's hit these point by point... |
| | |
| | 1. I've kind of wondered why we hadn't moved the inactive admins for ages now, but I am not one to question these things, as it doesn't seem to be a life-threatening issue. |
| | |
| | 2. More admins...I think that would be fine, but I want to make a suggestion: staff training. All staff members, old and new, including myself. Hear me out for a second. |
| | |
| | Speaking from some personal experience, and some that's been relayed to me from others: when you become a staff member on a wiki, it can get very overwhelming very quickly. So many new functions to use, so many people <s>bugging you with problems</s> seeking your assistance, you've done this thing someone asked for but now it's made three people mad at you, there's an edit war here and a talk page squabble there, and...AAAAA! I confess there are tools I'm still not sure about, and there have been situations where there could have been better responses. I just think it would be nice to help all of us to figure out what's the small stuff (well, speaking relatively), what to really worry about, and how to handle someone who's editing poorly versus an honest-to-diety-of-your-choice troll. It's just an idea; it would probably be a wiki sub-page as I can't see us finding time to be in IRC at once, but I think it would help all of us get a handle on our roles and where we need help covering our weaknesses. |
| | |
| | Let's see...where was I? Ah... |
| | |
| | 3. I'm very flattered, honestly. I don't think there's much more to it than I'm already doing, as Bluer pointed out, but then again it might be nice for Bluer not to have us bug him every six months or so with staff requests. ^_^ |
| | |
| | 4. I'm not sure about the Featured User, mostly because it seems very hard for all but the largest wikis to carry off. We have a sizable group of editors here, but nowhere near the numbers of, say, Memory Alpha or Uncycopedia. But I do like the merit badge ideas. It would be a nice motivator, especially considering we already collect userboxes like magpies collect shiny stuff... ^_-}} |