Forum:Monobook being kept?: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
{{SannseTalk|time=01:04, October 27, 2010 (UTC)|text=Monobook will stay as a personal option. Sorry if I wasn't clear, Monobook is an old skin without the full set of features so we don't need to put the same time and effort in to keeping it that we would with Monaco. It's also needed for the Wikipedia parody wikis like Uncyclopedia. I know that most people are concerned with Monaco, so that's the one I've been talking about in past messages }} | {{SannseTalk|time=01:04, October 27, 2010 (UTC)|text=Monobook will stay as a personal option. Sorry if I wasn't clear, Monobook is an old skin without the full set of features so we don't need to put the same time and effort in to keeping it that we would with Monaco. It's also needed for the Wikipedia parody wikis like Uncyclopedia. I know that most people are concerned with Monaco, so that's the one I've been talking about in past messages }} | ||
{{Maggosh|flint=You do know some of us want it to ''stay'', right?}} |
Revision as of 13:28, 27 October 2010
Okay, I have been reading Sarah's blog and it seems that while Monaco is being deleted, Monobook is being kept as a preference after November 3rd! SeanWheeler 13:38, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
Lovely. So Sannse was just making stuff up when she said they couldn't have two active skins.LapisLazuliScarab21:08, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
If Monobook's being kept, then those whole long forums that we created are pretty much worthless. Chitalian8
Not as good as Monoco, but still good news to hear. -- 21:13, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
Guess I gotta get re-adjusted to using Monobook, it's been so long. Chitalian8
While i agree with Havoc, i can't help but get the feeling that we've been cheated in some way or another--ShadowsTwilight 21:16, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
Are you really sure that Monobook is staying?Keyblade0
Wait... where does it say that Monobook's being kept? I'm not seeing that anywhere. And why exactly can they keep Monobook and not Monaco?LapisLazuliScarab21:30, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
Go here: http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Sarah_Manley/Improving_Accessibility_on_Wikia#comments and scroll down, she says it there. Chitalian8
Whoa, thats what I said, but you interrupted. (edit conflict). Why didn't you sign? Who interrupted me? SeanWheeler 21:42, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
Edit conflict! Yeah, I just saw it. And apparently they're tossing Monaco because it is "going out of style". ...Bull. First of all, what's that supposed to mean. Second, who decided that?LapisLazuliScarab21:38, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
|
It would still be Oasis for users that aren't logged into an account, right? --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 22:13, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Right. Plus, monobook is missing a lot of the features that we have relied on, like the table of contents. This is a Pyrrhic victory, if anything.(ಠ_ೃ) Bully! 22:23, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
|
|