|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LevL Fear my mighty instruments! — 08:59, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What is the Blaster? It's not an Unversed, and it doesn't look like a Disney character, so what is it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's a Disney character. It's one of the plasma cannons from Lilo and Stitch. 74.136.128.7 12:09, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
- The Blaster, like the Ball of Light is a simple, object-like enemy. It is not an Unversed, the Ultimania does not list it as one. --DTN
17:22, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UxieLover1994 Tiempo de morder de nuevo con el poder! El tema de hoy: su sorpresa! — 02:14, 2 April 2011 (EDT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 They don't appear to attack Aqua at all. I know, since I just found out a few hours ago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CaelumLucisCaliga Talk! - Join the Darkness. We have cookies. Dark Chocolate Chip Cookies! — 12:09, 2 April 2011 (EDT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Maybe because Aqua had permission by the Grand Councilwoman to be on the ship, whilst Terra and Ven were viewed as 'intruders'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UxieLover1994 Nya? — 21:46, 2 April 2011 (EDT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Then should we mention this on the article, then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CaelumLucisCaliga Talk! - The only thing sad about Final Fantasy X... Is that it leads to Final Fantasy X-2 — 00:52, 3 April 2011 (EDT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't. Seems too redundant to put in the article and if it was put as trivia...well we know how kryten feels about that. :P
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KrytenKoro - "Punch your lights out, hit the pavement. That's what I call entertainment. Causin' problems makes you famous - all the violence makes a statement."
TALK -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I see no issue with putting in the lead something like "They are only active in Terra and Ventus's scenarios, as Aqua has the Councilwoman's blessing to explore the ship."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When destroyed?[edit]
We see the destroyed Blasters every now and then, so why not put their appearance in? (And for some of us, it is a bit hilarious seeing their twitching movements when they are destroyed. I live a sad life.) TRSNX 12:25, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Why not? I'm for it. :)--NinjaSheik 01:33, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Anyone can provide a render of them destroyed, please? TRSNX 07:54, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
