Forum:Archiving policy: Difference between revisions

From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:


{{Uxie|time=20:01, 31 July 2012 (UTC)|text=I archive my messages after at least two weeks, though some have lasted about a month. I recomend at least a month.}}
{{Uxie|time=20:01, 31 July 2012 (UTC)|text=I archive my messages after at least two weeks, though some have lasted about a month. I recomend at least a month.}}
{{ShardofTruth|time=20:39, 31 July 2012 (UTC)|talk=I archive after the page passed the hundredth message, navigation becomes unbearable after this point. That being sad this is [[User talk:DisneyGirkeybladewielder95|not the first case]] of instantly message archieving but I think these cases will be rare and are not worth our time.}}
{{ShardofTruth|time=20:39, 31 July 2012 (UTC)|talk=I archive after the page passed the hundredth message, navigation becomes unbearable after this point. This being said this is [[User talk:DisneyGirkeybladewielder95|not the first case]] of instantly message archieving but I think these cases will be rare and are not worth our time.}}

Revision as of 20:40, 31 July 2012

KHWiki-Forum Logo.png
Forums: Index > The World that Never was > Archiving policy


DaysSaix.png
Sove Talk! — "Pitiful Heartless, mindlessly collecting hearts. And yet, they know not the power they hold. The rage of the keyblade releases those hearts. They gather in darkness, masterless and free. Until they weave together to make Kingdom Hearts. And when that time comes, we can truly, finally exist."

"True, we don't have hearts, but we remember what it was like. That's what makes us special." — 19:31, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

User talk:Soraxroxas

This is getting ridiculous. He is now going to archive messages the second he reads them and we don't have any rule against doing that. I propose that only messages older than x amount of time may be archived. Archives already make it harder when you want to search something from someone's talk page, so archiving should have limits.

I also propose that warnings may only be archived after one year has passed since the most recent warning, after which they can be archived and considered expired. Not only this allows a user who rarely gets warnings to have the warnings eventually expired, it also makes tracking warnings much less bothersome, when we don't need to check the user's archives for any previous warnings.

And let the discussion begin!

6 months minimum. That's my policy on my own archive. Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I cannot accept, and the wisdom to hide the bodies of those I had to kill because they pissed me off. - Erry 19:57, 31 July 2012 (UTC)


SoraHalloweenTalk.png
UxieLover1994 Tiempo de morder de nuevo con el poder! El tema de hoy: su sorpresa! — 20:01, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
710MS.png I archive my messages after at least two weeks, though some have lasted about a month. I recomend at least a month.
XMbQaeM.png
ShardofTruth Once you believe, truth and lie are quite the same thing. — 20:39, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Game Clear Data KHRECOM.png I archive after the page passed the hundredth message, navigation becomes unbearable after this point. This being said this is not the first case of instantly message archieving but I think these cases will be rare and are not worth our time.