Forum:Monobook being kept?: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Chitalian8 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Not as good as Monoco, but still good news to hear. --{{User:JFHavoc/Sig}} 21:13, October 26, 2010 (UTC) | Not as good as Monoco, but still good news to hear. --{{User:JFHavoc/Sig}} 21:13, October 26, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Guess I gotta get re-adjusted to using Monobook, it's been so long. | Guess I gotta get re-adjusted to using Monobook, it's been so long. {{User:Chitalian8/Sig}} | ||
While i agree with Havoc, i can't help but get the feeling that we've been cheated in some way or another--[[User:ShadowsTwilight|'''<span style="color:#000000">Shadows</span>''']][[User talk:ShadowsTwilight|'''<span style="color:#505050">Twilight</span>''']][[File:Χ-blade (Incomplete) KHBBS.png|50px]] 21:16, October 26, 2010 (UTC) | While i agree with Havoc, i can't help but get the feeling that we've been cheated in some way or another--[[User:ShadowsTwilight|'''<span style="color:#000000">Shadows</span>''']][[User talk:ShadowsTwilight|'''<span style="color:#505050">Twilight</span>''']][[File:Χ-blade (Incomplete) KHBBS.png|50px]] 21:16, October 26, 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:22, 26 October 2010
Okay, I have been reading Sarah's blog and it seems that while Monaco is being deleted, Monobook is being kept as a preference after November 3rd! SeanWheeler 13:38, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
Lovely. So Sannse was just making stuff up when she said they couldn't have two active skins.LapisLazuliScarab21:08, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
If Monobook's being kept, then those whole long forums that we created are pretty much worthless. Chitalian8
Not as good as Monoco, but still good news to hear. -- 21:13, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
Guess I gotta get re-adjusted to using Monobook, it's been so long. Chitalian8
While i agree with Havoc, i can't help but get the feeling that we've been cheated in some way or another--ShadowsTwilight 21:16, October 26, 2010 (UTC)