Template talk:InfoBattle: Difference between revisions
From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::The template offers nothing substantial to the event pages since battles don't have clear-cut sides, strength and casualties so we're required to extrapolate a great deal. Infoboxes are meant to offer additional information that isn't found on the main article and the battle template doesn't do this at all; everything is already explained in the "Combatants" and "Story" sections. {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 19:55, 9 July 2014 (UTC) | ::The template offers nothing substantial to the event pages since battles don't have clear-cut sides, strength and casualties so we're required to extrapolate a great deal. Infoboxes are meant to offer additional information that isn't found on the main article and the battle template doesn't do this at all; everything is already explained in the "Combatants" and "Story" sections. {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 19:55, 9 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::Wikipedia and several other wikias have those kind of templates and they don't have much of a problem with it. [[User:Byzantinefire|Byzantinefire]] ([[User talk:Byzantinefire|talk]]) 19:57, 9 July 2014 (UTC) | :::Wikipedia and several other wikias have those kind of templates and they don't have much of a problem with it. [[User:Byzantinefire|Byzantinefire]] ([[User talk:Byzantinefire|talk]]) 19:57, 9 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
::::But we're not Wikipedia. Anyway, a third (and fourth) opinion? {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 20:06, 9 July 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:06, 9 July 2014
We don't use this template for anything and I don't see the need for it. Should we delete it? TheFifteenthMember 19:47, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
- Its a good template deleting it would be a waste just make more Event pages. Byzantinefire (talk) 19:50, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
- The template offers nothing substantial to the event pages since battles don't have clear-cut sides, strength and casualties so we're required to extrapolate a great deal. Infoboxes are meant to offer additional information that isn't found on the main article and the battle template doesn't do this at all; everything is already explained in the "Combatants" and "Story" sections. TheFifteenthMember 19:55, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
- Wikipedia and several other wikias have those kind of templates and they don't have much of a problem with it. Byzantinefire (talk) 19:57, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
- The template offers nothing substantial to the event pages since battles don't have clear-cut sides, strength and casualties so we're required to extrapolate a great deal. Infoboxes are meant to offer additional information that isn't found on the main article and the battle template doesn't do this at all; everything is already explained in the "Combatants" and "Story" sections. TheFifteenthMember 19:55, 9 July 2014 (UTC)