Talk:Attack

Rescue

I asked Pea what this command said and he answered 'Heal Light'? From what I can see in that screenshot, the mechanics are the same to Rescue so it's probably the same thing. Can we include it as the same thing or do we still need to check the Japanese for all the other Rescues and the English for BBS? TheFifteenthMember 16:52, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

It is Heal Light; can you try to find a video to confirm it's the same?"We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 00:48, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Format

Could we organise all the special forms of attack into a table somehow? It would certainly be much neater than the prose we have now. Which parameters would we need? TheFifteenthMember 21:23, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

That is a very good question. I can only think of two or three: name, description and when it comes up, but the last two might be combined. It won't be elegant, in any case. --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 03:44, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

I think most attacks would fit with those three categories. If there's a few where the last two parameters overlap, we can either be redundant, use a dash, or use a colspan (whichever works best). I can imagine that it won't be elegant; we'll need a few drafts to have it fine tuned. TheFifteenthMember 18:15, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Revamp

So I've been working on a new version of this page, with tables covering all attacks. However, I need a bit of feedback as to what should be on the page and what not.

• Should we list attacks for all party members, or only playable characters? Party members also have standard attacks, but they're not linked to the Attack command.
• Should we include combo abilities, like Sliding Dash, Blitz, Explosion, etc., or only basic attacks?
  • What about abilities that require a different button, like Upper Slash or Omega Finale?
  • And what about reprisals, like Counterguard or Payback Raid?

I'm currently including all of the above, but it's getting quite massive, so we can either go for collapsed tables, cut some stuff out, or maybe move abilities with existing pages to a less detailed table, as the pages themselves would have that information. Let me know what you all think. TheSilentHero 12:04, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

I think limiting the list to only playable characters is a good idea, while party members can have the list as part of their page (Donald and Goofy's articles begin to do this already). As for all of the other kinds of attacks, I vote throw them on the list, as they directly impact the attack command string. Though, maybe we should make a separate page to cover all of the reprisals, kind of like what was done for Y-Combos. Aid1043 (talk) 14:16, 31 August 2022 (UTC)