User talk:SneaselSawashiro

The ultimate battle for KINGDOM HEARTS is upon us.

We hope you enjoy your time on the Kingdom Hearts Wiki! Before you contribute, please see the following: Traverse Town is our community portal. It lists current wiki events and contains important information. Help:New user guide states how this wiki is run. It is a useful starting point for beginners. Help:Editing provides tutorials on basic wiki markup. The Word That Never was is where users go to discuss wiki-related issues. Your input would be greatly appreciated! Your user page is the place to tell others about yourself, if you wish to do so. In need of inspiration? See the user page guide! If you have any questions, please ask our administrators for help. Remember to sign any posts you leave on their talk pages with four tildes ("~~~~")! Thank you for joining the Kingdom Hearts Wiki community! We look forward to working with you. May your heart be your guiding key! — —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neumannz (talk • contribs) 02:12, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Mystery Gear

The Mystery Gear weapons are personality-symbol weapons, not joke weapons. The Aubade is a symbol of Roxas's personality."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 04:10, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Ah crap, sorry. DX --SneaselSawashiro (talk) 18:42, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

walkthrough phrasing re xemnas

Although some sites have a habit of doing it, it nkes absolutely no sense to phrase a walkthrough as if the reader or game player is actually a keyblade wielder. Also, language like "it is essential" or "must be noted" makes us sound pompous without actually adding informative content. Remember, accuracy and brevity."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 14:50, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Some stuff that may already long be unacceptable

I've noticed that a lot of my changes are being reverted. And of course, even though I try my best to add details to most of the articles, well, I guess I'm just doing nothing but having people clean up after me getting annoyed. I've already been banned on one other wiki for that once, and I wonder why no one is banning me already. People/admins are clearly not accepting my changes, and I would technically be wasting their time. And no, I'm sadly not confident in that I'm going to make better changes; I've done much of the same crap you've had to clean up over and over again. --SneaselSawashiro (talk) 19:17, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your edits are not necessarily "crap." They are, however, often poorly worded or disrupt the flow of what you are adding on to. Wiki editing takes practice. Do not get discouraged, no matter how frustrating it may be to see people revert your edits. - Eternal Nothingness XIII 20:06, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

EDIT CONFLICT! YAY!

Hi there, I'm KeybladeSpyMaster, one of the administrators here at the Kingdom Hearts Wiki. I've gone over your contributions over the last two weeks. Some of them (like the difference in Japanese and English voice actors for Roxas) are rather trivial and unnecessary, for which reason they were reverted. Others, like your edit reverted just now on Magic Hour, could be tied to the lack of evidence that your edits are true. This wiki prides itself on being the most professional and correct, and to achieve that goal, it has a notable requirement for proof before making any controversial edits. You are always free to argue your case for any specific edits. For example, regarding your edits to Magic Hour, if you can prove that Roxas and Data-Roxas are legitimately using Magic Hour (via a video of the gameplay, for example), then your edits could be restored. Sometimes, we're just wrong on what we know of the series. Just because we're administrators or veteran users doesn't mean we know everything on the Kingdom Hearts series (though we do make an effort to). Here's an example: over the weekend, one of our editors reverted and edit that claimed Ventus's heart didn't affect Sora's ability to wield the Keyblade, and instead allowed him to dual-wield. The editor that made the claim was right (it was in an interview with Tetsuya Nomura following the release of Birth by Sleep), but because there was no proof, the edit was reverted. We didn't know about the interview or what Nomura had said. When we did find the interview that affirmed the claim, the edits were restored, along with the proof for future reference.

In any case, I do not believe in a ban solely for editing mistakes like this. I believe that if you're willing to change and improve your edits, providing proof and, if needed, making your case on an edit you made, then there is no reason to ban you. We don't ban people who are willing to improve; we ban people who are blatantly editing destructively, who make no effort to improve and instead try and cause conflict. I do not believe you are one of those people. If you have any questions or concerns on editing here, just ask me on my talk page, and I'll be happy to help. KeybladeSpyMaster 20:16, 14 January 2015 (UTC)