Game talk:Sark

Easily Defeated? Well, while it is true that Sark is easy to kill, I don't think is should mention how easy it is to beat him Because it seems a bit opinionated. PLus, it may be insulting to those who did find Sark difficult. Not that anybody does I am sure.(Bananaphone1996 21:34, June 4, 2010 (UTC)) (Bananaphone1996 07:37, June 3, 2010 (UTC))

Title

Why is the Character page called Sark, while the Boss page is called Commander Sark and the journal refers to him as Sark. Organization13 12:02, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

Hello? Organization13 11:56, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

Anyone? Organization13 13:01, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

If the Journal just calls him Sark, the page should just be "Sark (Boss)".LapisLazuliScarab21:11, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

So, shouldn't the name be changed? Organization13 18:19, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Why is he considered a "somebody"?

My complaints about the term "somebody" in general aside, shouldn't Sark be considered a "Data" character? 70.71.109.113 23:01, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Though he may be made of data, he is a complete being- which is what technically constitutes a Somebody. And yes, I do think we need to change the term. -- AS IF! 23:13, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Weren't we going to change it to "Other" or something?"We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 02:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)