Forum:Oasis: Difference between revisions

From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
::@Lego: It wouldn't be the default skin. It would just be for those who really want it. Despite how few the numbers are, they are greater than zero. {{User:Soxra/Sig|t=9:52pm, March 13, 2011 (UTC)}}
::@Lego: It wouldn't be the default skin. It would just be for those who really want it. Despite how few the numbers are, they are greater than zero. {{User:Soxra/Sig|t=9:52pm, March 13, 2011 (UTC)}}
:::"because people want it" isn't a good reason. It's an excuse. --{{User:LegoAlchemist/Sig}} 17:58, 13 March 2011 (EDT)
:::"because people want it" isn't a good reason. It's an excuse. --{{User:LegoAlchemist/Sig}} 17:58, 13 March 2011 (EDT)
{{KrytenKoro|Okay, wow. No, that is not why we left.
#Wikia ''FORCED'' us to use a skin that was incompatible with the majority of our content.
#We left because they were refusing to even discuss the matter with us.
#If we bring Oasis back here, it would NOT be the default skin. It would be entirely optional, like Vector and Roundedblue and Monobook and any other skins we bring in are (on that note, someone needs to set Monaco as the default skin).
##One of our main goals is to make this the ''editor's'' wiki, not wikia's, so if there is ANY skin that an editor likes, we should be able to install it so that they can personally use it.
}}

Revision as of 22:18, 13 March 2011

Gummi Garage.png
Forums: Index > Gummi Garage > Oasis

We need this."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 16:38, 6 March 2011 (EST)

We need what? Oasis? What are you talking about? WE hate Oasis. It isn't a good look. Oasis was part of the reason why we moved. I always use Monobook on Wikia. And weren't you one of the people who hated Oasis? SeanWheeler 17:31, 13 March 2011 (EDT)

Some people liked it, believe it or not. Also, if we got a hand on some Oasis coding, we could change stuff on the skin that made us leave, like the page width. Chitalian8 17:39, 13 March 2011 (EDT)

EDIT CONFLICT: Is this some kind of joke? Explain yourself, Kryten, because bringing oasis back is a poor decision. The whole reason this site exists is because the content on the wikia-wiki was incompatible with Oasis. We have enough skins as it is, and we can't make the site 100% functional for all of them. Bring Oasis back into the picture would just screw us up even further. We'd be seen as bloody hypocrites if we brought it back. If you really want Oasis back, we might as well pack our bags and go back to wikia, because it makes no sense to re-install it after we bitched about it for months and then seceded. Oasis is for wikia; if you want it, you should go back to the wikia-wiki, which could really use some attention. It sucks canal water over there. --VenCharm.pngLegoAlchemistVenCharm.png 17:42, 13 March 2011 (EDT)
@Lego: It wouldn't be the default skin. It would just be for those who really want it. Despite how few the numbers are, they are greater than zero. Soxxeh 9:52pm, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
"because people want it" isn't a good reason. It's an excuse. --VenCharm.pngLegoAlchemistVenCharm.png 17:58, 13 March 2011 (EDT)
209.png
KrytenKoro - "It is often said that before you die your life passes before your eyes. It is in fact true. It's called living."
TALK -
Okay, wow. No, that is not why we left.
  1. Wikia FORCED us to use a skin that was incompatible with the majority of our content.
  2. We left because they were refusing to even discuss the matter with us.
  3. If we bring Oasis back here, it would NOT be the default skin. It would be entirely optional, like Vector and Roundedblue and Monobook and any other skins we bring in are (on that note, someone needs to set Monaco as the default skin).
    1. One of our main goals is to make this the editor's wiki, not wikia's, so if there is ANY skin that an editor likes, we should be able to install it so that they can personally use it.