Talk:Doc (ability)

Wouldn't it make more sense to mention this variation on the main Cure page, instead of having a completely seperate article? Same for the other Dwarf Commands and any similar ones (I think Cinderella does the same thing.).LapisLazuliScarab19:17, October 24, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I agree. This is needless. maggosh 19:23, October 24, 2010 (UTC)

Thirded. --Ag (Silver) - 47 107.8682 amu ~Crono 20:36, October 24, 2010 (UTC)

I agree too, but instead of being mentioned in the respective magic spell, why not just mention it on the D-Link page instead?Erry 20:41, October 24, 2010 (UTC)

This, Vanitas, and Cinderella each have purely D-Link-specific commands. Do we want to mention them as part of the D-Link pages? Especially since all of them but Vanitas's are clones of normal commands, I think.(ಠ_ೃ) Bully! 20:49, October 24, 2010 (UTC)

There isn't really a place for that on the D-Link table, and not all of the D-Links have commands like this.LapisLazuliScarab20:47, October 24, 2010 (UTC)

We mean the Vanitas (D-Link) page. The D-Links should eventually have their own pages which cover the abilities, obtainment, and commands, I think. The D-Link table is kind of too scrunched, even before Oasis.(ಠ_ೃ) Bully! 20:49, October 24, 2010 (UTC)

Ah, in that case, yes, it would be better to put them on the D-Link pages.LapisLazuliScarab20:53, October 24, 2010 (UTC)

I agree that the D-Links need their own page, but do we have enough info? And how would we format them? I'll be happy to help out, but I don't want to start any pages and make you guys have to tear them apart because I fail <_< --Ag (Silver) - 47 107.8682 amu ~Crono 20:55, October 24, 2010 (UTC)

EDIT: I'm gonna start on the Vanitas (D-Link) page, and see if I can work something out for it to look good. --Ag (Silver) - 47 107.8682 amu ~Crono 20:56, October 24, 2010 (UTC)