Forum:Image Captions - Yay or Nay?: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Regardless of the outcome of this forum, I'd like to think we should update the MoS (when are we gonna start the process of actually rebooting the thing to include all of our new policies and such? Operation:Keychain?...). I know the MoS is not something "set in stone," based on what others have said when I mention it, but I'd like to think it is the opposite of the Pirate's Code; not just "guidelines," but actual rules...}} | Regardless of the outcome of this forum, I'd like to think we should update the MoS (when are we gonna start the process of actually rebooting the thing to include all of our new policies and such? Operation:Keychain?...). I know the MoS is not something "set in stone," based on what others have said when I mention it, but I'd like to think it is the opposite of the Pirate's Code; not just "guidelines," but actual rules...}} | ||
{{ENX|time=18:05, 23 February 2015 (UTC)|text=It's been almost a week, guys. What are we gonna do here?}} | {{ENX|time=18:05, 23 February 2015 (UTC)|text=It's been almost a week, guys. What are we gonna do here?}} | ||
{{KrytenKoro|Possible compromise (and believe me when I swear up and down I hold no preference for or against this): infoboxes? It would satisfy the framing concerns, and could possibly subsume a fair bit of the mechanics sections.}} | |||
If you did that, what would go in the box? Could it be for anything besides action abilities/commands? --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 21:26, 23 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
::EDIT: I would be alright with paring down captions as much as possible. I agree that specifying game/character in a caption is only necessary for abilities that differ between them. As for placement, unless you want to separate per-game mechanics by full-clears, there's not necessarily going to be clear section-to-image relationships. Galleries for essentially redundant images would be fine. --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 21:26, 23 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
::AP, description, when learned. Possibly the damage algorithms given by the guides. It would be possible to handle for all abilities, but would work best for those with images. | |||
::For placement, yes, I think they should have full clears if they have images in the mechanics section. Otherwise, the image should go in a gallery, I feel.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 22:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
:::Personally, I do not like the infobox idea since in most cases, we do not have a gif for every game/character, which would leave empty space/red links. If we do go along with the infobox, we can also put buy/sell price in there. {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 18:32, 24 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
::::Just a reminder, infoboxes do not need to have images.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 22:24, 24 February 2015 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 22:24, 24 February 2015
|
|
|
If you did that, what would go in the box? Could it be for anything besides action abilities/commands? --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 21:26, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- EDIT: I would be alright with paring down captions as much as possible. I agree that specifying game/character in a caption is only necessary for abilities that differ between them. As for placement, unless you want to separate per-game mechanics by full-clears, there's not necessarily going to be clear section-to-image relationships. Galleries for essentially redundant images would be fine. --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 21:26, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- AP, description, when learned. Possibly the damage algorithms given by the guides. It would be possible to handle for all abilities, but would work best for those with images.
- For placement, yes, I think they should have full clears if they have images in the mechanics section. Otherwise, the image should go in a gallery, I feel."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 22:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Personally, I do not like the infobox idea since in most cases, we do not have a gif for every game/character, which would leave empty space/red links. If we do go along with the infobox, we can also put buy/sell price in there. TheFifteenthMember 18:32, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- Just a reminder, infoboxes do not need to have images."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 22:24, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- Personally, I do not like the infobox idea since in most cases, we do not have a gif for every game/character, which would leave empty space/red links. If we do go along with the infobox, we can also put buy/sell price in there. TheFifteenthMember 18:32, 24 February 2015 (UTC)