Forum:How is Vanitas an Unversed: Difference between revisions
Evnyofdeath (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Chainoffire (talk | contribs) (archiving) |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|Twilight Town Library}} | {{Forumheader|The Realm of Sleep|Twilight Town Library}} | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Must.....contain.......atheist.....rage...... | Must.....contain.......atheist.....rage...... | ||
Well, I believe MX said that Vanitas was born of Negativity and what is an Unversed? Negativity. Also, the stratagy guide marks him as an Unversed. --Evnyofdeath 04:50, September 10, 2010 (UTC) | Well, I believe MX said that Vanitas was born of Negativity and what is an Unversed? Negativity. Also, the stratagy guide marks him as an Unversed. --Evnyofdeath 04:50, September 10, 2010 (UTC) | ||
{{ST|text=rage? nvm, even in atheist pov, fictional god creates fictional humans, fictional god goes, fictional humans go with it, fictional god is not a fictional human, fictional vanitas creates fictional unversed, fictional vanitas goes, fictional unversed go with it, fictional vanitas is not a fictional unversed, and he is not created from negativity as the unversed were, he was created from darkness (two toootally different concepts buddy)}} | |||
I guess I misread the subtitles then. But again, the stratagy guide marks him as an Unversed. While he may not be a normal unversed, he is still clasiffied as one. Also, yes, Rage.--Evnyofdeath 05:06, September 10, 2010 (UTC) | |||
{{ST|text=gonna go a little off topic here, but why rage?}} | |||
Lets just say I find roughly 110% of the bibles content to be contridictary to itself and inhumane. Its also grossly inaccurate with what we know of the world. --Evnyofdeath 05:54, September 10, 2010 (UTC) | |||
{{ST|text=sooo...your raging because i believe something you do not}} | |||
No. I actually have respect for people who devote themselves to religion. In fact, for the longest time one of my best friends was a christian. I just don't like the concept of the christian god, and in all truth very little from the book can be proven to have happened. --Evnyofdeath 06:09, September 10, 2010 (UTC) | |||
{{ST|text=well duh, if it was all about proof we would've lost a long time ago, it's just that... ya know what, this is not the place for this}} | |||
True. And I am not one to go hunting for an argument, and in all actuallity, I have little intrest in religious debate.--Evnyofdeath 06:13, September 10, 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:52, 4 September 2014
|
Must.....contain.......atheist.....rage...... Well, I believe MX said that Vanitas was born of Negativity and what is an Unversed? Negativity. Also, the stratagy guide marks him as an Unversed. --Evnyofdeath 04:50, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
|
I guess I misread the subtitles then. But again, the stratagy guide marks him as an Unversed. While he may not be a normal unversed, he is still clasiffied as one. Also, yes, Rage.--Evnyofdeath 05:06, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
|
Lets just say I find roughly 110% of the bibles content to be contridictary to itself and inhumane. Its also grossly inaccurate with what we know of the world. --Evnyofdeath 05:54, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
|
No. I actually have respect for people who devote themselves to religion. In fact, for the longest time one of my best friends was a christian. I just don't like the concept of the christian god, and in all truth very little from the book can be proven to have happened. --Evnyofdeath 06:09, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
|
True. And I am not one to go hunting for an argument, and in all actuallity, I have little intrest in religious debate.--Evnyofdeath 06:13, September 10, 2010 (UTC)