Forum:Days Weapon cleanup

From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Revision as of 04:03, 11 March 2011 by KrytenKoro (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search
KHWiki-Forum Logo.png
Forums: Index > The World that Never was > Days Weapon cleanup


Heyo, guys."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 21:35, 10 March 2011 (EST)

  • "Game" template should be "game"
Infobox
  • remove size paramaters
  • Make sure there are not extraneous spaces in the infobox
  • Remove <br> tags from the description, except for when they parse "An upgraded X."
  • Remove piped links from the get parameter
Lead
  • Remove nihongo template UNLESS THE WEAPON IS NAMED WITH KANJI
    • in which case, make sure the nihongo template is still there; for Lexaeus's weapons, it looks like Silva removed them a while back ([1]), so if you could put them back, that would be awesome
  • Reduce the lead down to the form used on The Empress
    • if there are bits about design or gameplay, just throw them in the relevant sections as best you can, or remove them entirely, they don't really matter
  • Make sure that lead has "The" before the weapon names
Other
  • If you see any misspellings (underlined in red), please correct them.
  • Any galleries should be merged into the Design section.

Some examples:


Discussion

I don't have time to start tonight, but I'll do it as soon as possible. --File:Xigbar - Replica Data.pngAS IF!File:Xigbar - Replica Data.png 21:42, 10 March 2011 (EST)

The Gameplay sections should actually be double-checked by anyone who can. Not to belittle the work of those who went through them before, but there is certainly some information missing, e.g. differences between the gameplay of normal and upgraded versions.

I don't know what you mean by "diff of what you want done", Kryten. Also, there isn't exactly any functional difference between "game" and "Game" (even less of a difference than between "sec-stub" and "section-stub", because in this case they are the exact same template), so while I find it remarkably stupid when people go around actively capitalizing templates, it doesn't seem any less stupid to actively undo it, too. --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 22:02, 10 March 2011 (EST)

Sorry, that was a comment from Crono that I accidentally posted. Removed.
There's no practical difference, no, but it irks me. Pretty much all of the articles need work anyway, so might as well change the capitalization if it's there.