Forum:Citations: Difference between revisions

From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:


{{DTN|text=I believe that citations are put in the final section of an article. I agree that they are necessary. For example, lots of information on 358/2 Days is coming in, and lots of it is questionable. As it turns out, most of the questionable information comes from YouTube videos. This information would seem less questionable with the use of citations, as well as information from the Startegy Guides. So yes, I agree that citations should become a part of this Wiki.}}
{{DTN|text=I believe that citations are put in the final section of an article. I agree that they are necessary. For example, lots of information on 358/2 Days is coming in, and lots of it is questionable. As it turns out, most of the questionable information comes from YouTube videos. This information would seem less questionable with the use of citations, as well as information from the Startegy Guides. So yes, I agree that citations should become a part of this Wiki.}}
{{BebopKate|text=There are templates for citations; I think the <nowiki><ref></nowiki> tags work on here, too, and that's pretty easy to use.  And especially with information coming in from outside the games themselves...absolutely.  It might have a side benefit of cutting down some of the overly large Trivia sections.
So we can all be enlightened, in what way is our information unreliable?  Is it on all the new stuff coming in, or is it a more widespread issue?}}

Revision as of 02:26, 16 June 2009

KHWiki-Forum Logo.png
Forums: Index > The World that Never was > Citations
DaysZexion.png
Guardian Soul Talk. — Don't I even warrant a hello?

It's such a shame. The Organization used to be the rope that bound us together. - {{{time}}}

Keyblade-Blk.png I'm always hearing about how unreliable this wiki is, even though it's gotten so much better. I think that if we want to take things to the next level, that we really need to start using citations. Perhaps we can start looking up facts on articles and put references at the bottom of the pages. Once we do that, people can't just say that we're unreliable any longer.

I'm not entirely certain how the citation system works however, I tried to figure out how it works on wikipedia. Do we need to set up some sort of template? I think it's important that we get this worked out.


Room Core.png
DoorToNothing Heartless Emblem.png — I dreamed last night... I got on the boat to Heaven!

And by some chance, I had brought my dice along!

Keyblade-Blk.png I believe that citations are put in the final section of an article. I agree that they are necessary. For example, lots of information on 358/2 Days is coming in, and lots of it is questionable. As it turns out, most of the questionable information comes from YouTube videos. This information would seem less questionable with the use of citations, as well as information from the Startegy Guides. So yes, I agree that citations should become a part of this Wiki.
Daisy-ChainofFakeries-1.png
BebopKate - This one is Zazzles...because he's Zazzy!
TALK - Here's your cat...and here's your $20...{{{time}}}
There are templates for citations; I think the <ref> tags work on here, too, and that's pretty easy to use. And especially with information coming in from outside the games themselves...absolutely. It might have a side benefit of cutting down some of the overly large Trivia sections.

So we can all be enlightened, in what way is our information unreliable? Is it on all the new stuff coming in, or is it a more widespread issue?