Forum:Wiki Thoughts - Please Read

DoorToNothing — I dreamed last night... I got on the boat to Heaven! And by some chance, I had brought my dice along! — 00:52, August 3, 2010 (UTC) KingdomKeyDarkside, I think that my post above should act as rebuttles to most of the replies you just posted; I did accuse admins, ops, and everyone of not following the rules, among other points. Okay, this is my main concern: "We are NOT the Final Fantasy Wiki. We can make this work the way we want it to, and the FFWiki's failure with their MA does not reflect how ours is going to turn out." ... this is evidence, KingdomKeyDarkside, evidence. That is like saying that if you put vinegar and baking soda in a cup, and the product fizzes, then putting the exact same amounts of vinegar and baking soda into a carbon copy of that cup will not result in it fizzing. You don't even provide a reason why the "vinegar and baking soda won't fizz", being the success of the Mirage Arena, with a different "scientist", being the wiki, performing the experiment. Evidence is evidence, and it cannot be denied. Also, you say all editors deserve equal treatment. That's just it, we do that. But an editor's actions can act as the "cause" of certain "effects" of this treatment. For example, if a user does outstanding work, we will praise them. If a user vandalizes, we will warn them. If a user causes drama, we will try and settle it or move of off-wiki. All cases are the same, we do not intentionally try to praise one user specifically and not another user. If a user does good work, they can expect praise for their deeds from us. If they do not contribute to the wiki's growth and instead just laze around in the forums and user talkspace, they certainly won't expect "Good job!" or "That's some great editing!" messages on their talk page.