Forum:Was the move a bad idea?: Difference between revisions

From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:


Basically, the flaws you've attributed to the move are actually just typical things to find on a Wiki. They have nothing to do with our split from Wikia.}}
Basically, the flaws you've attributed to the move are actually just typical things to find on a Wiki. They have nothing to do with our split from Wikia.}}
I response to your points:
*A page with less content is definitly not a bad thing.  Most of the "new content" on the Wikia wiki is speculation, which is ''bad''.
*True, Wikia is hauling in a large majority of the new users, but that doesn't matter.  If you check [[Special:ContributionScores|this]], at the very bottom, you will notice that we have at least '''50''' users that have made a total of 600 edits have editted here since the site was set up.
*No.  In no possible way was it a bad idea.  The problem with Wikia wasn't really about Oasis.  While that was a big part of it, it was more about the fact that Wikia wouldn't listen to its users, the ones who made its bloody content.  They constantly forced inappropriatly crappy updates on us, and we had enough.
{{The Inexistentsig}} 21:33, 6 May 2011 (EDT)