Forum:Design vs. Appearance: Difference between revisions

From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 55: Line 55:
:Counter-counter-solution: Get rid of "Appearance" entirely. It's a flimsy, wishy-washy term that is oh-so-limited. Each thing within KH, even the characters, has a healthy history of design decisions and background, from the clothes they wear to the name they have. ''Especially'' Sora, Riku, and Kairi. Using "Design" also allows for discussion of the ''process'' of creating the character, such as GrieverSora— - separating out everything but the looks means we must have "Etymology" and "Development" sections.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 00:13, 28 May 2011 (EDT)
:Counter-counter-solution: Get rid of "Appearance" entirely. It's a flimsy, wishy-washy term that is oh-so-limited. Each thing within KH, even the characters, has a healthy history of design decisions and background, from the clothes they wear to the name they have. ''Especially'' Sora, Riku, and Kairi. Using "Design" also allows for discussion of the ''process'' of creating the character, such as GrieverSora— - separating out everything but the looks means we must have "Etymology" and "Development" sections.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 00:13, 28 May 2011 (EDT)
::Oooh, I like that. --{{User:LegoAlchemist/Sig}} 01:02, 28 May 2011 (EDT)
::Oooh, I like that. --{{User:LegoAlchemist/Sig}} 01:02, 28 May 2011 (EDT)
If we took away Appearance entirely, what would the term be? Design? I hardly think we can have Design on living creature pages. As T_I said:You don't design an animal.{{User:Darkheart3/Autosig}}03:04, 28 May 2011 (EDT)