"Please don't revert"
Is not a defense for edits being incorrect.
- For one, the section clearly states that these are all changes from the original Japanese version. This section is about comparing BBSFM with BBSJAP, and it confuses the issue to twist it into a comparison with BBSNA.
- Parantheses, and specifically the method you used to mark non-NA changes, are garish as all hell.
- Edit warring is never allowed. If your edit has been reverted and you can't cite MoS policy for why it should be there, you need to discuss it on the talk page.
Now, a suggestion to both sides: why not just separate the changes into two sections, "Changes new to this version" and "Changes taken from NA release"? It would convey exactly the same information without looking unprofessional or aesthetically unpleasing."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 03:08, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Holy shit, seriously look at what your edit is doing. In addition, while "Dark Seeker Saga" is the formal name, Nomura in the same interview says that "Xehanort Saga" is the informal name (not "incorrect"), and well, that name's more relevant to this page, while Dark Seeker would be more relevant to the true Org 13 page.
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.