Editing Forum:@&%&*@%&$@&*$%

From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Forumheader|The Realm of Sleep|The World that Never was}}
{{Forumheader|The World that Never was}}{{sticky}}


<!-- Please put your content under this paragraph.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
<!-- Please put your content under this paragraph.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
Line 148: Line 148:
For the rest... yes, I know it's pretty different.  A big change for everyone.  But one thing I'd like to say is that this is a work in progress.  We are still working on changes as we get feedback and start to give information from click-tracking and so on.  One thing we are looking at is a special unit that could take infoboxes in to the right column.  And we are looking at how to better handle big tables.  It's worth remembering that if they are too big for the new layout, they are ''already'' broken for many screen resolutions... but we are talking about some other solutions that may help.
For the rest... yes, I know it's pretty different.  A big change for everyone.  But one thing I'd like to say is that this is a work in progress.  We are still working on changes as we get feedback and start to give information from click-tracking and so on.  One thing we are looking at is a special unit that could take infoboxes in to the right column.  And we are looking at how to better handle big tables.  It's worth remembering that if they are too big for the new layout, they are ''already'' broken for many screen resolutions... but we are talking about some other solutions that may help.


And the last thing I want to encourage, is for admins to try customizing the wiki.  The blue and white look is the default (like the old "sapphire") but you can make it look very different.  Have a look at [[wikia:communitytest|Community Test]], or anyone can try out the tool at [[wikia:themedesigner|themedesigner.wikia]] (even if you aren't an admin).  I know this doesn't resolve all your worries, but I hope you'll try it anyway}}
And the last thing I want to encourage, is for admins to try customizing the wiki.  The blue and white look is the default (like the old "sapphire") but you can make it look very different.  Have a look at [[w:c:communitytest|Community Test]], or anyone can try out the tool at [[w:c:themedesigner|themedesigner.wikia]] (even if you aren't an admin).  I know this doesn't resolve all your worries, but I hope you'll try it anyway}}


Yeah, but there's the thing.  You ask for feedback, and we give it.  What is the common response?  '''Make it an option'''.  Do yoy listen? I think you know the answer.  {{The Inexistentsig}}
Yeah, but there's the thing.  You ask for feedback, and we give it.  What is the common response?  '''Make it an option'''.  Do yoy listen? I think you know the answer.  {{The Inexistentsig}}


<!--[[File:Prt 2.png|300px]]--> - So, yeah.  I only had like 10 minutes to make this, but I'll update it <small>hopefully...</small>.  Mainly, it is exactly what Monaco is right now, which is the point.  If we were to found our own site, I would recommend use of the MediaWiki software.  I was also thinking (but didn't have time to) that we could have the background banner go all of the way to the bottom of the screen.  So... anyone can update the file to what they think it should look like...  {{The Inexistentsig}}
[[File:Prt 2.png|300px]] - So, yeah.  I only had like 10 minutes to make this, but I'll update it <small>hopefully...</small>.  Mainly, it is exactly what Monaco is right now, which is the point.  If we were to found our own site, I would recommend use of the MediaWiki software.  I was also thinking (but didn't have time to) that we could have the background banner go all of the way to the bottom of the screen.  So... anyone can update the file to what they think it should look like...  {{The Inexistentsig}}


{{KKD|time=01:11, October 13, 2010 (UTC)|link=I really hate to say this, guys, but I don't think we should leave as soon as the new look is implemented, if at all. I think we should give them one month, starting November 3rd. If everything still sucks come December, we leave, no questions asked. Not that I like the new skin at all, but we may as well give them a chance. A small one, but a chance.}}
{{KKD|time=01:11, October 13, 2010 (UTC)|link=I really hate to say this, guys, but I don't think we should leave as soon as the new look is implemented, if at all. I think we should give them one month, starting November 3rd. If everything still sucks come December, we leave, no questions asked. Not that I like the new skin at all, but we may as well give them a chance. A small one, but a chance.}}
Line 163: Line 163:


This is how it appears for me:
This is how it appears for me:
<!--
<gallery>
<gallery>
File: KHWikiBroken.jpg
File: KHWikiBroken.jpg
</gallery>
</gallery>
-->


It makes the wiki almost unusable for me. also it's not in the screenshot but the words WikiaWikiaWikiaWikiaWikia are repeated at the top of the screen.}}
It makes the wiki almost unusable for me. also it's not in the screenshot but the words WikiaWikiaWikiaWikiaWikia are repeated at the top of the screen.}}
Line 226: Line 224:
#Old wiki: As you can read [http://simpsons.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:Moving_Forward here], the old KHwiki will stay here the same way we leave it, deleting pages, even it it's the will of all editors and admins, will be considerd as vandalism by the Wikia staff and reverted. So there will be basically two wikis, which kind of misses the point of moving and is an insult to all editors on top.}}
#Old wiki: As you can read [http://simpsons.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:Moving_Forward here], the old KHwiki will stay here the same way we leave it, deleting pages, even it it's the will of all editors and admins, will be considerd as vandalism by the Wikia staff and reverted. So there will be basically two wikis, which kind of misses the point of moving and is an insult to all editors on top.}}


{{17m|text= Okay, I opened the KHWiki and the new skin is suddenly applied, like, automatically. Does this happen to everyone?}}
{{17master|text= Okay, I opened the KHWiki and the new skin is suddenly applied, like, automatically. Does this happen to everyone?}}


{{Kog981|text= I can't take any more this new skin, just looking at some pages like Sora or BBS, that's creepy me out.  
{{Kog981|text= I can't take any more this new skin, just looking at some pages like Sora or BBS, that's creepy me out.  
Line 232: Line 230:
Eh... You guys decide to move? With everything you guys done?}}
Eh... You guys decide to move? With everything you guys done?}}


{{Uxie|time=13:03, October 20, 2010 (UTC)|text=Grr, [[finalfantasy:Wakka|now I'm mad]]! This skin has ruined this wiki, and the SW!
{{Uxie|time=13:03, October 20, 2010 (UTC)|text=Grr, [[w:c:finalfantasy:Wakka|now I'm mad]]! This skin has ruined this wiki, and the SW!


Now that the new skin is up and running, I have decided to move the Spyro Wiki to ShoutWiki. If anyone wants to join us, be my guest!}}
Now that the new skin is up and running, I have decided to move the Spyro Wiki to ShoutWiki. If anyone wants to join us, be my guest!}}
Line 243: Line 241:
{{KrytenKoro|Re:Shard - I'm very interested to know who WoWwiki is moving to, because if they can handle WoWwiki, they can absolutely handle us.
{{KrytenKoro|Re:Shard - I'm very interested to know who WoWwiki is moving to, because if they can handle WoWwiki, they can absolutely handle us.


As for the old wiki concern - as long as the top-content producing editors move along with the wiki, that will cease to be a concern pretty soon. As you can see with [[wikia:transformers|the transformers wiki]], the wikia version quickly fell into the rubbish bin when the top editors moved away and left the old address to anyone who wanted it. Yes, Google favors wikia and wikipedia, but only to an extent, and once we make our site the premier place (and keep up our affiliations, very important!), we will replace them. We could even go further by seeking out affiliations with other KH-related sites, including webcomics (ex: Ansem Retort).}}
As for the old wiki concern - as long as the top-content producing editors move along with the wiki, that will cease to be a concern pretty soon. As you can see with [[w:c:transformers|the transformers wiki]], the wikia version quickly fell into the rubbish bin when the top editors moved away and left the old address to anyone who wanted it. Yes, Google favors wikia and wikipedia, but only to an extent, and once we make our site the premier place (and keep up our affiliations, very important!), we will replace them. We could even go further by seeking out affiliations with other KH-related sites, including webcomics (ex: Ansem Retort).}}
{{KrytenKoro|Also - to circumvent the "advertising" concern - when we move, we should not post "Hey, come to our new address". We should post something along the lines of "The previous editors of this wiki have moved to a new address, (link). Anyone visiting this site is free to to edit it as they wish and build their own community, or may join the previous community at its new location. If you would like to inquire about obtaining staff rights, please contact (wikia staff member<!-- whose inbox we want to swamp-->). This notice will be removed (three months later)." That cannot be construed as advertising the new site - it is merely stating where everyone has gone, and if anything advertises the ''current site'' -
{{KrytenKoro|Also - to circumvent the "advertising" concern - when we move, we should not post "Hey, come to our new address". We should post something along the lines of "The previous editors of this wiki have moved to a new address, (link). Anyone visiting this site is free to to edit it as they wish and build their own community, or may join the previous community at its new location. If you would like to inquire about obtaining staff rights, please contact (wikia staff member<!-- whose inbox we want to swamp-->). This notice will be removed (three months later)." That cannot be construed as advertising the new site - it is merely stating where everyone has gone, and if anything advertises the ''current site'' -


Line 300: Line 298:


I understand that you cannot handel two skins at once, but why put the rotten skin on when everybody hates it? All you just want to do is make eveyone love it. Tough luck; the Spyro Wiki is leaving. Sorry to be so rude, but I am very upset.}}
I understand that you cannot handel two skins at once, but why put the rotten skin on when everybody hates it? All you just want to do is make eveyone love it. Tough luck; the Spyro Wiki is leaving. Sorry to be so rude, but I am very upset.}}
{{LapisScarab|time=16:00, October 23, 2010 (UTC)|text=@Sannse: Really? People have said they ''love'' it? A challenge: prove it. I garuntee that for every user that supposedly loves this skin I can give you at least a dozen users that don't. As far as I'm concerned the "silent majority" (and the majority has been ''far'' from silent) doesn't exist. If there are people who like this skin and can come up with good reasons for why to keep it, it's ''their'' responsibility to speak up. As of now, it just seems like you're trying to make some imaginary support for the skin.
Don't give me this crap about how having two skins is "too complicated". Right now there's ''three'', Monobook, Monaco, and Oasis. I realize that you alone aren't responsible for this, and I know we're kind of beating you up here, but I'm on my last nerve. You aren't listening to us, you're just being patronizing.
And that scrolling glitch is still sort of going on. It only happens once every time I load the page and it may just be that I'm scrolling down too fast too early, but it's yet another problem that didn't exist with Monaco.}}
{{ST|text=It doesn't even happen just when scrolling, i think it happens every time the page reloads. Go to a page with tabs in the infobox. every time you click on a tab, it jumps straigh back to the top. And, i agree, "silent majority" sounds like a term used by someone who can't accept their own failures}}
I'm not joking about that "for every one who likes it there's 12 who dislike it" thing. Say you found ten people that absolutely loved it. I don't care if they're staff or not, they just ''love'' this skin. Well, [http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:Athena32 here's] 108 people, and counting, that don't.{{User:LapisScarab/Sig}}18:40, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
{{Soxra|mad=Sannse, firstly I'd like to say that I admire you for having the courage to actually post on our forum thread about this. It takes guts to step into the crossfire of one of the largest issues we've faced on Wikia in recent history.
With that being said, I want to say that I have to agree with LapisScarab. Honestly, it does not feel like ANYone is saying they love it. I've seen revolt here, and on the AWA... just Google "Wikia oasis skin" and you will see how many hosted Wikis have considered moving (that's right--moving, leaving, 86-ing, whatever you want to call it) because of this enforcement.
Why even create the new skin to begin with? It doesn't even sport local Wiki logos (like our little icon of Ventus & co. up there in the top left). If you can't handle supporting two skins (which you can, by the way--Monaco & Monobook), then don't make more and force us to move.
Take a look at [[User:Soxra|my userpage]] using the Oasis skin, then look again using the Monobook skin; then, tell me it looks as good or better on Oasis. You can't.
Here's what you should have done, and still should. If you want to instate a new skin, make a vote open to all Wikis. Each Wiki can hold a poll and their admin can give you a yay/nay from the masses. I bet if you had done this, it never would have gotten this far. I'd bet ''a lot'' on that.
So this is just my $0.02 but based on reactions across the board I'd say I'm not the only person thinking it. I'm glad you came here to give your little speech but now it's time for a response--justification of what you're doing. All our cards are on the table; it's time to show your hand.|time=<span style="font-weight: bold; text-shadow: 1px 1px 2px #000000;">[[ [[User:Soxra|<span style="color: #FFC000;">So</span><span style="color: #CC0000;">x</span><span style="color: #FFC000;">ra</span>]] ]]</span> 18:45, October 23, 2010 (UTC)}}
{{TalkSephiroth0812|text=I can only second Soxra's statement. I've looked around a bit and also in the german branch of wikia I've noticed nearly all reactions were mostly negative. Even some unregistered users complained in comments that they can't read their favorite wikis properly anymore because the articles are messed up with symbols and images overlapping. Worse is they're stuck with the new skin and don't even have a chance to revert it...}}
{{Galexgan|time=02:24, October 24, 2010 (UTC)|terra2=@Sansse: The silent majority was the Tea Party'ers before they made their movement, if there is a silent majority for this skin then they aren't only being silent they've freakin gone into exile to live as hermits because not only are they not being heard but their not seen anywhere either.}}
{{Uxie|time=02:37, October 24, 2010 (UTC)|text=I don't think she's going to listion, anymore. I've already created some nooses for those who love the skin of Darkness!}}
{{17m|text= Just because you have the power, doesn't mean you won't listen to what people said. You're trying to make improvements for the wikias right? But here is what happened: '''It Failed'''. It's clear that a lot of people don't like the new skin, and yet you're forcing us to use the skin. What are you trying to proof really? That the new skin will be better than the older ones? If that's what you're thinking then you need to look at it from our perspective. Sure it looks nicer with the gloss and stuff, but it's not efficient. We're trying to give informations here, not showing off with good looks and stuff. If you can make the wikia look good AND efficient, then that's fine, we'll happily use that skin, but as I mentioned before, the new skin caused too much problem, it's not efficient, people won't be reading our articles because it's so messy. Think about that, will you? I know the staffs put a lot of hard work into this, but this is not working out. I know we never give you anything in return for the services you provide us, but what's the use of making changes and improvements if the majority of us won't like it or even use it?}}
i like the new skin[[Special:Contributions/76.108.34.28|76.108.34.28]] 16:44, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
{{OavatosDK|time=16:57, October 24, 2010 (UTC)|text=At the very least why can't wikia let all wikis set Monobook as the default? Why should Unencyclopedia get special treatment?
(Posting here because Sannse hasn't commented at all on the FFWiki.)}}
Monobook is still available in Preferences. You can change it to that if you want to (for now).--'''<span style="font-family:papyrus">[[User:LapisScarab|<span style="color:midnightblue;">Lapis</span>]]<span style="color:black;">Scarab</span></span>''' 17:07, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
{{Keyblade0|time= 17:13, October 24, 2010|text= @78.567-whatever. Please tell me that the mysterious person is joking. I mean, how can you ''like'' the new skin? It’s horrible! There are way too many problems with the new skin. Twice, I’ve tried it, and it was horrible. It felt like I’ve left the website, and gone into a wasteland! It’s unconstitutional that anyone should like that horrible new skin. I mean, what good does the new skin provide, besides making all the Wikis leave Wikia. It’s bad, “erases” pages, has many glitches, and causes everything to run slow!(And my CPU is fast!). Why change it, if it’s going to cause all of this? Just erase the new skin, or let it be optional. }}
{{ST|text=now,now let's playe fair, Keyblade0. Ok, so we finally have a normal uer who actually likes it, and that's ok, that's ok everyone's entitled tol their opinions. So i guess now it puts the Hate/Love ratio to 34/1 on this page alone, not exactly in your favor, Sannse}}
{{LapisScarab|time=19:11, October 24, 2010 (UTC)|text=It's still 35/0. Judging from the anon's edits, that is Keyblade0's unregistered account.}}
ouch--[[User:ShadowsTwilight|'''<span style="color:#000000">Shadows</span>''']][[User talk:ShadowsTwilight|'''<span style="color:#505050">Twilight</span>''']][[File:Χ-blade (Incomplete) KHBBS.png|50px]] 19:14, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
{{The Inexistent|dusk='''Okay guys, she isn't listening anymore, so can we stop bitching and get back to the real discussion?  <big><big>Are we moving, or not?</big></big>'''}}
{{ST|text=if they're gonna be like that and not take our opinions into account, i guess we don't havea choice. congratulations, Sannse & co., all that hard work and all it's gonna get you is the loss of a s***-load of wikis. I hope you feel like you accomplished something}}
{{Uxie|time=12:33, October 25, 2010 (UTC)|text=Sannse, congrats on LOSING many wikis. I am "proud" of you for your "awsome" skin!
But then, where do we go? There is ShoutWiki (where I am moving my wiki to), but it's better that you decide. But I am just saying; if you want to move to ShoutWiki, then I can help you with that!}}
{{TalkSephiroth0812|text= I'm actually neutral in this issue, as a total Wiki-newbie I've no idea how complex a complete move of all stuff would be, that's for the KH-Wiki staff to decide. The only thing I would ask is to be notified if a move takes place so that I may either register anew at the new provider or can then contact Uxie for the "relocation" help.
One other thing, I read some of you have contact with the Final Fantasy-wiki, is their stance to this already settled?
And what about i.e. Wookieepedia for example...the Star Wars wiki is a quite big one, are they "satisfied" with this skin?}}
{{KrytenKoro|GUYS. STOP RAGGING ON SANNSE. She is trying to do her job, whether we think she should be asked to or not.
Now, PLEASE, I'd like some opinions on which of the target options we've discussed would work. Even if we all agree to move the wiki, that can't proceed until we agree where we would move it ''to'', so if you guys don't like Oasis, you need to start comparing options pronto.}}
Since this is the "complain about it to no end" forum, maybe we should move the practical part of the discussion to a new page and start over there.  --[[User:Neumannz|'''<span style="font-family:Gisha; color:#005400">Neumannz</span>''']], [[User talk:Neumannz|''<span style="color:black; font-family:Agency FB Bold">The Dark Falcon</span>'']] 16:07, October 25, 2010 (UTC)
That sounds good. {{User:Organization 13/Sig}} 16:31, October 25, 2010 (UTC)
{{Uxie|time=04:57, October 26, 2010 (UTC)|zoe=Yeah, okay. This page is getting too hard for us to edit on, anyway.}}
{{KrytenKoro|text=Also, Sannse, [http://kingdomhearts.wikia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Azul81677&curid=3807&diff=416440&oldid=411854 this] might explain why you guys are getting more "clicks" with the new ToC.}}
Okay, I read Sarah's blog about [[wikia:Community:User blog:Sarah Manley/Improving Accessibility on Wikia|the new look]] and I found out that while Monaco is being thrown away, they are keeping Monobook! Looks like they aren't forcing their shit in our faces after all! Either, they responded to the hate mail or they didn't tell us they were keeping Monobook, leading us to the conclusion that monobook is gone as well, scaring us to death. Anyway, monobook is back! [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] 21:24, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
{{SannseTalk|time=00:58, October 27, 2010 (UTC)|text=Sorry all, I couldn't get online as much as I wanted this weekend >_< I'm catching up now.
The Inexistent: For most people, their watched pages show there, and on some wikis their achievement badges.  There are likely to be other units in the future in that area, which is why it's been left ready for them
ShadowsTwilight: The jumping problem has turned out to be more persistent than we thought... Sorry about that, we are looking in to it!
LapisScarab: yes, there have been more negative comments than positive so far, I'm not trying to pretend otherwise.  This is a long-term project, and we'll be tracking actual usage of the skin as well as direct feedback on it as it settles in.
Monobook is not a complex skin with the same level of features as Monaco and the new look, so it's easier to keep that around.  It's the two skins that we would need to actively maintain that matter here... it's just not practical to keep both I'm afraid.
Sora: I agree, if we asked current Monaco users if Monaco is good enough, most would say yes.  But we want to do more, and to provide a skin that works for as many visitors as possible: including future visitors.  That's what we are trying to do with the new look
17master: the new look has only been live for a few weeks.  I know that some will never get used to it, but it's way too soon to know how well our user testing matches the actual effect of the change.
OavatosDK: Uncyclopedia is a parody of Wikipedia and so needs to look a  bit like it -- it's a historical thing, they moved to us with that in place.  It's not something we are extending to other wikis
Keyblade0: games like that don't really help... but it does actually show one of the problems for those who ''have'' given positive feedback -- they get shouted down and sometimes even attacked for their opinions.  Change is hard, and I understand the concerns people have about what's going on
Everyone: Something I would suggest, give it some time.  You have the right to copy the content to a new wiki whenever you want to...  I'd really recommend living with the new look for a while, before deciding anything
I hope I didn't miss anything in all that!}}
{{ST|text=While it is not unimaginable for people to get ''used'' to it, i don't find it concievable for people to ''appreciate'' it, especially with the articles being compressed to only taking up a quarter of the screen and yielding to absolutely nothing}}
What the hell were they thinking!?! Wikia are a$$holes! I simply canNOT navigate with Oasis! There are so many messups with it! Tabs don't work, pictures are  fu%^ed up, everything is so badly f&*@ed up that I can't even use wiki with oasis! I don't even know how to edit and do my job anymore! #$&#%*@&#*$(%&! I suggest we move! Have a nice day, and thank you for choosing Mar rants airlineMar 02:21, October 29, 2010 (UTC)
And also, every logo changes with Oasis. Why would they change the logos? That is highly vandalism! [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] 22:46, October 29, 2010 (UTC)
{{ST|text=SON OF A BASTARD!!!!! WHY IS IT SO HARD FOR THESE PEOPLE TO LISTEN!?!?}}
{{Soxra|mad=Sorry, Sannse. I can't see sense in anything you've posted. You want us to get used to this skin... and provide ample reason for future users to join Wikia. Then answer me this: Why do pages only take up a quarter of the width of the screen? People don't use 640x480 resolutions anymore--on my 1920x1080 laptop I can hardly stand to look at a page because of all the squishing that takes place. We rely on images to convey our encyclopedic content and you're just pushing them out. It doesn't work.
Do whatever you want, it's your Wikia. But I'll urge you to keep in mind two things: 1) You shouldn't have to force change down the throats of everyone here. We get new users all the time--you can make Monaco look better without making a new skin. If you want to modernize it, leave it to the preferences menu. It's not too hard to maintain two skins at once. I've done it myself. (Don't just stuff technical jargon down our throats by saying it takes more resources--that's bull and you know it.) And 2) Keep in mind the big picture here--with wikis leaving and users p/o'd, you're going to lose a lot of ad revenue and a lot of loyal people. Why would you place so much on the line for so little gain?
As said, do what you want--but there's the bigger picture.|time=<span style="font-weight: bold; text-shadow: 1px 1px 2px #000000;">[[ [[User:Soxra|<span style="color: #FFC000;">So</span>]][[User_talk:Soxra|<span style="color: #CC0000;">x</span>]][[User:Soxra|<span style="color: #FFC000;">ra</span>]] ]]</span> 17:09, November 3, 2010 (UTC)}}
Actually the screen looks fine on all the computers i use, whether its my school, home, or laptop computers...maybe the  problem just is with ur guys' computers? Idk, i'm just not sure why my computer looks fine with the new skin while all of urs dont... --Jacobmirror 14:31, November 5, 2010 (UTC)
{{TNE|time=20:32, November 6, 2010 (UTC)|angrytext=an Ankou is back, but only momentarily.
One reason why I became inactive is because of my dissertation. '''The other is the new Wikia skin.''' I'm now implementing it on KHFR under my Prefs simply because newer users will automatically get this skin. But TBH, a lot of templates, including the Game template, have been really messed up, and to foul things up so bad requires a bad decision on someone's part. Now, we did everything we could reasonably do, and if it's still bad, it comes from :
#Bad implementation.
#Bad implementation.
#<big>Bad implementation.</big>
I've been trying to hold the Wikia Oasis edit window down for the last couple of minutes but everytime I do so, it keeps moving upwards. This problem was less frequent under Monaco, and though I haven't tried Monobook, I already have begun to have the impression that the new skin needs some serious reqorking, if it cannot be scrapped.
Now, whilst I know everyone's doing his work, this is a serious tactical error where Wikia is concerned. I've already given my 2p for the skin in the past ; I'm just reiterating what I've said based on experience.}}

Please note that all contributions to the Kingdom Hearts Wiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see KHWiki:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Templates used on this page: