Talk:The Ghost of Scar: Difference between revisions
(→Rename) |
(→Rename) |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
I think it should because it's the official name. --[[User:Elfdemon|Elfdemon]] ([[User talk:Elfdemon|talk]]) 23:27, 3 February 2016 (UTC) | I think it should because it's the official name. --[[User:Elfdemon|Elfdemon]] ([[User talk:Elfdemon|talk]]) 23:27, 3 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
:If I remember correctly, the names were used interchangeably, but there's only one name that can be used in the title pages, and that is the name used in Jiminy's Journal or the Trinity Archives or similar. Correct? '''[[User:Troisnyxetienne|<font color="#222222">TRS</font>]][[User talk:Troisnyxetienne|<font color="#444444">NX</font>]]''' 15:23, 7 February 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:23, 7 February 2016
Pureblood?
Is this even a heartless, much less a pureblood? It seems to just be the lingering darkness from Scar's heart (admittedly, that's pretty similar to what Pureblood Heartless are). However, it either attracts or becomes an Emblem Heartless, which Purebloods can't do.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 19:14, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
|
- So we can remove the category, then?Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 01:46, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
|
|
|
Trivia and Name
The trivia part is incorrect, the ghost appeat in front of the hyenas after the fight with them in the 2nd visit. And the real name of the ghost is "The ghost of Scar" (In Jiminy's journal). Should we change it?
|
Strength?
Why is it's strength 40 if it doesn't attack? Chainoffire 04:54, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Doesn't matter, strength and defense are fixed for the enemy's level, these stats having nothing to do with how the bosses/regular enemies act. ShardofTruth 09:01, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Rename
Shouldn't this page be renamed to "The Ghost of Scar" instead of "Scar's Ghost" because that's what it's called in Jiminy's Journal? --Elfdemon (talk) 10:18, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
The name issue was brought up before in one of the other sections above. I don't really see the point of renaming it, personally, but for consistency's sake, perhaps we should...?--NinjaSheik 23:06, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
I think it should because it's the official name. --Elfdemon (talk) 23:27, 3 February 2016 (UTC)