Forum:Staff Reorganization and the Goblet of...wait

From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Revision as of 07:19, 22 July 2010 by KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{Forumheader|The World that Never was}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ --> {{…')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search
KHWiki-Forum Logo.png
Forums: Index > The World that Never was > Staff Reorganization and the Goblet of...wait


209.png
KrytenKoro - "I'm the doctor, I'm the patient. Don't forget that - it's important! If you love me like I love me, everybody will be sorry."
TALK -
As most of you probably know, eight of our admins are inactive, as well as one of our mods.
  1. DTN, Neumannz, TNE, Azul81677, and I thought it might be a good idea to ask the inactive/retired staff if they would like to be moved off of the active staff list, possibly creating openings for new admins. So far, we have been able to contact everyone but Riku5464 and Urutapu. Azul81677 has fully retired, so we have at least one opening as of now. This does not mean that he or any other retired editors will lose their powers - merely that they will no longer be listed as active staff.
  1. However, we don't want to start elections until we know exactly what the situation is - as of now, the plan is still to hold elections in August in preparation for BBS. If we end up having enough space for new admins, we'll probably start some elections then, and try to maintain a set base of active admins.
  1. We also thought it would be a good idea to have BebopKate promoted to Bureaucrat, since all of our current Bureaucrat's aren't invested in the community, and are difficult to contact. We need your approval on this, though.
  1. Finally, KKD and LegoAlchemist had suggested merit badges, of a sort, and Auror, SilverCrono, and TheInexistent had been discussing a Featured User setup. I think that it might be a good idea to treat this as a sort of "Employee of the Month", where the community nominates the most respected editors, and the staff will go through their edits and make a decision. To prevent favoritism or drudgery, staff would not be eligible, and we probably wouldn't do repeats.