Forum:Re: Coded and Re: CoM Articles

Forums: Index > The World that Never was > Re: Coded and Re: CoM Articles

AlVan - I'm the leading man, you know. TALK - {{{time}}} This page and this page are built very differently for some reason. Re:CoM's is more like the Final Mixes where it has a list of differences from the original game, whereas Re: Coded's is built like a normal game page. So should we keep it like it is, change Re:Coded's to Re:CoM's style, vice-versa, or a combination of both? When I say combination of both I mean make it like a normal game article along with the list of differences or perhaps making a page by itself for the list of differences.

Pea14733 Freeze! — 10:40, 14 July 2011 (EDT) I think we shouldn't change them. Because Re:coded is entirely different from coded(if not count the plot), making it feels like it is a different game. Re:CoM, on the other hand, still has the same battle system as CoM.

KrytenKoro - Pinocchio with his nose attached to the trigger of a rifle, which points at his face as he says, "I want to live!" TALK - The re-released games should not have plot synopsis, unless it's a new scene, so that can go. They should have an introduction, a section on announcement and development, and a section on major changes (gameplay and matrix system for Re:coded, for example). Next, a comprehensive list of all changes, organized by type, and finally, a screenshot gallery and a packaging gallery. Each re-released game is going to need this. That's a general overview, and specific sections can be hashed out on those articles' talk pages.