|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KrytenKoro - "It is often said that before you die your life passes before your eyes. It is in fact true. It's called living."
TALK - 08:50, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously, Possessor and Thresholder are going to need to be merged. However, since Tresholder is not truly a Heartless, but rather a puppet of the Possessor, I was thinking of simply merging Tresholder into Possessor, like was done for Queen of Hearts (Boss). While I was at it, I wondered if you guys would be okay with me merging the Gargoyle Knight and Warrior articles in as well, as they are also statues being manipulated by the Possessor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eternal Nothingness XIII -  I'm not afraid of what the darkness holds now. Even if you do wrest control of my heart from me, even if you cast me into the deepest, darkest abyss, you'll never sway me from the one cause that pushes me to keep on fighting. Whatever the cost, I'm ready to pay it.
TALK - There's darkness within me... So what does that matter? I know I'm strong enough to hold it back. — 15:03, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 While I was not the intended target, I have a right to voice my opinion. While it does make sense to merge Thresholder and Possessor, it does not make since to merge the two Gargoyles.If you want to merge, then you would have to add the GK and GW to the Possessor page too, along with Thresholder, because they are all linked to Possessor. That would be too long of an article. If you merged these, then you would have to do it with other enemies that fight together like Volcanic Lord and Blizzard Lord. These are all Heartless and Separate enemies in the game, So I feel we should stick to what the game says.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
He's actually got a point Possessor and Thresholder are the same thing BUT gargoyles are possessed by different "minor" possessors, NOT the same possessor and are also not in the Thresholder fight, see Xemnas123 16:57, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BebopKate - This one is Zazzles...because he's Zazzy!
TALK - Here's your cat...and here's your $20...19:28, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think if they maintain separate entries in Jiminy's Journal, they should maintain separate entries here.
Besides, it's not immediately obvious that the Possessors are behind the statues, especially if you haven't played through 358/2 Days. The Possessor in the Thresholder battle is more obvious, but I don't know if that warrants a merged article either. Doesn't the journal treat that Heartless as "The Thresholder" and not as two entities?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
