Talk:Ruler of the Sky: Difference between revisions
(→Story section: new section) |
m (→Story section) |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
A few days ago, a user reverted my edit to the Story and Design sections, claiming that I "remove[d] correct grammar and pertinent info on Pete." On the subject of grammar, I'll defer. Nevertheless, there was a very logical reason behind my rearranging ('''not''' deleting) the info on Pete. If you are familiar with Mission 78 from 358/2 Days, you will see that Pete arrives on the scene '''after''' Hook releases the Ruler of the Sky. However, in the article, it mentions that Pete "shows up" "[a]s Roxas arrives in Neverland." My edit was aimed at correcting an inconsistent ordering of events. | A few days ago, a user reverted my edit to the Story and Design sections, claiming that I "remove[d] correct grammar and pertinent info on Pete." On the subject of grammar, I'll defer. Nevertheless, there was a very logical reason behind my rearranging ('''not''' deleting) the info on Pete. If you are familiar with Mission 78 from 358/2 Days, you will see that Pete arrives on the scene '''after''' Hook releases the Ruler of the Sky. However, in the article, it mentions that Pete "shows up" "[a]s Roxas arrives in Neverland." My edit was aimed at correcting an inconsistent ordering of events. | ||
KrytenKoro, if you read this, please understand that I have no wish to quarrel over this edit, and am certainly willing to work with you on implementing this change as necessary and proper. That being said, I strongly feel that your reverting my edit in its entirety, along with what I feel to be a very logical rewording of the Story section, was unjustified. I hope you will carefully consider my line of reasoning in putting in place the necessary changes. | KrytenKoro, if you read this, please understand that I have no wish to quarrel over this edit, and am certainly willing to work with you on implementing this change as necessary and proper. That being said, I strongly feel that your reverting my edit in its entirety, along with what I feel to be a very logical rewording of the Story section, was unjustified. I hope you will carefully consider my line of reasoning in putting in place the necessary changes. [[User:DAnonymous318|DAnonymous318]] ([[User talk:DAnonymous318|talk]]) 05:31, 9 March 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:31, 9 March 2016
name source?
Umm
Can someone please rewrite the information? It's very... um... strange--PrincessAndie8thprincessofheart 17:52, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
|
should there be a video
i say yes ive tried to beat 6 times but i always lose and next thing you know my bro replaces the file65.32.75.73 21:50, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
also because its entertaining but just get a video ok EO it will help the clueless also {note go to my talk page to vote on wether or not to hear an embarassing secret on my brother65.32.75.73 21:54, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
Something's wrong with this page...
|
|
Story section
A few days ago, a user reverted my edit to the Story and Design sections, claiming that I "remove[d] correct grammar and pertinent info on Pete." On the subject of grammar, I'll defer. Nevertheless, there was a very logical reason behind my rearranging (not deleting) the info on Pete. If you are familiar with Mission 78 from 358/2 Days, you will see that Pete arrives on the scene after Hook releases the Ruler of the Sky. However, in the article, it mentions that Pete "shows up" "[a]s Roxas arrives in Neverland." My edit was aimed at correcting an inconsistent ordering of events.
KrytenKoro, if you read this, please understand that I have no wish to quarrel over this edit, and am certainly willing to work with you on implementing this change as necessary and proper. That being said, I strongly feel that your reverting my edit in its entirety, along with what I feel to be a very logical rewording of the Story section, was unjustified. I hope you will carefully consider my line of reasoning in putting in place the necessary changes. DAnonymous318 (talk) 05:31, 9 March 2016 (UTC)