Editing Talk:Aeroplane

{{TNE|time=18:15, 7 May 2015 (UTC)|blahtext=Point of contention, but my fiancé who is seated right next to me at the time I am writing this, is well learned in history, and WWII is something that not very many history scholars or older people forget, at least. So:

Those goggles and hats that the Aeroplane pilots wear.... they're not specifically British. Every faction that fought in WWII wore them; in fact, ''every fighter pilot'' wore them. Look at this for instance.

[[w:c:Flight helmet|<font color=gold>Flight helmet page on WP</font>]]

Now the design of the aircraft, to him at least, suggests it's more inspired by a Russian build, than an actual Spitfire (if that's what everyone's thinking). The paint especially. Some might say the paint job looks like a Spitty's, but it's much more muted, and a Spitty's nose is rounder.

It's just me nitpicking here, but just saying: the point I'm trying to drive home is that the design and the flight helmet usage ''do not suggest'' that it is a British thing. It's a cartoonish depiction of many features of aircraft from decades past, coming together. So if anyone wants to come and correct me for not saying it's a British thing, or modifying the description....... well, you've got this block of text to take into account.}}
@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 Those goggles and hats that the Aeroplane pilots wear.... they're not specifically British. Every faction that fought in WWII wore them; in fact, ''every fighter pilot'' wore them. Look at this for instance.
-(I could link the WP page on the flight helmet, but it won't bloomin' let me. So look it up on WP for yourselves.)
+[[w:c:Flight helmet|<font color=gold>Flight helmet page on WP</font>]]
-Now the design of the aircraft, to him at least, suggests it's more inspired by a Russian build, than an actual Spitfire (if that's what everyone's thinking). The paint especially. Some might say the paint job looks like a Spitty's, but it's much more muted, and a Spitty's nose is rounder, and it has an enclosed cockpit (as do most WWII aircraft).
+Now the design of the aircraft, to him at least, suggests it's more inspired by a Russian build, than an actual Spitfire (if that's what everyone's thinking). The paint especially. Some might say the paint job looks like a Spitty's, but it's much more muted, and a Spitty's nose is rounder.
 It's just me nitpicking here, but just saying: the point I'm trying to drive home is that the design and the flight helmet usage ''do not suggest'' that it is a British thing. It's a cartoonish depiction of many features of aircraft from decades past, coming together. So if anyone wants to come and correct me for not saying it's a British thing, or modifying the description....... well, you've got this block of text to take into account.}}
-{{TheSilentHero|time=18:21, 7 May 2015 (UTC)|reyn=Here's the link: {{w|Flight helmet}}. If you're sure it's not British, feel free to remove it.}}
-Cheers, TSH. I had no idea how to insert it without buggering my text up. WP's Flight helmet page has the German design, which looks similar, the Type B-6, which doesn't seem specific to anyone but was used in WWII, and there's a dead link to Red Army flight helmets, which I would have otherwise loved to see. Regardless: edited. '''[[User:Troisnyxetienne|<font color="dodgerblue">Trois</font>]][[User:Troisnyxetienne|<font color="darkslateblue">nyx</font>]]''' 18:27, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
-{{KeybladeSpyMaster|time=18:34, 7 May 2015 (UTC)|text= I think the more correct article we're looking for is {{w|Aviator hat}}. In any case, there's no mention of Britain in the article (the closest mention of a country is the reference to Charles Lindbergh, and American aviator), so the reference to Great Britain in our article is false.}}