8,476
edits
Forum:Re: Coded......not so great: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
{{WB|Ven=I 100% disagree that Re:coded is "not so great". I have played the game (not completely though), but that's not the point. Why are games created for anyway? It's for the thrill, excitement and challenge, people! And those changing gameplays just brought up more thrill, excitement and ESPECIALLY challenge. Cuz' we KH gamers have played the Kingdom Hearts series for years now. And they all have the same gameplay and were used to it now! So maybe Square Enix thinks that it will bring up more challenge if they add different gameplays!}} | {{WB|Ven=I 100% disagree that Re:coded is "not so great". I have played the game (not completely though), but that's not the point. Why are games created for anyway? It's for the thrill, excitement and challenge, people! And those changing gameplays just brought up more thrill, excitement and ESPECIALLY challenge. Cuz' we KH gamers have played the Kingdom Hearts series for years now. And they all have the same gameplay and were used to it now! So maybe Square Enix thinks that it will bring up more challenge if they add different gameplays!}} | ||
{{UnknownChaser|time=I can't focus on time right now, because I'm too busy focusing on my art.|art=I found the game to be quiet interesting. I like that fact that Square Enix decided to incorporated different styles of gameplay (side-scroller, shooter, turn base). The only problem I had was the camera angle and how it never stay in place or was out of place and the "continue" screen, how after you die at a boss, instead of them taking back to the part you die, it takes you back all the way to the beginning of the battle. But I didn't found the game to be "not so great", just more challenging then other games in the series.}} | |||