User talk:Christoph Schrader/Magic Page Specimen: Difference between revisions

User talk:Christoph Schrader/Magic Page Specimen (edit)

Revision as of 18:14, 29 September 2010

1,784 bytes added , 13 years ago

→‎Comments and Suggestions

KrytenKoro

53,710

edits

@@ Line 58: / Line 58: @@
 "Recurring" is the correct term. It does not imply that it appears in every installment, just that it appears in more than one.  --[[User:Neumannz|'''<span style="font-family:Gisha; color:#005400">Neumannz</span>''']], [[User talk:Neumannz|''<span style="color:black; font-family:Agency FB Bold">The Dark Falcon</span>'']] 18:03, September 29, 2010 (UTC)
+:No, Salvation is not relevant. Salvation will get it's own page. It does not need to be covered here. That is a major misunderstanding of how the "see also" works.
+:Re:Angel Star: "Appears" is the clincher there.
+:Theme, yes. "Explicitly uses this spell", no, which is why I dislike it.
+:"What a technique does and how to obtain it are the basic points of information about it." - they are also pretty much all there is to say about these abilities, since they have no influence on the plot, and are purely mechanical concepts. Most anything further is waffling.
+:Yes, I am tactless. It helps get people to give up faster on changing my mind.
+:This series is called Kingdom Hearts. It is a crossover between Final Fantasy and Disney. If a spell is called "Firaga", it probably came from the Final Fantasy spell "Firaga", and does not have an informative etymology in Indo-European languages. Yes, it is entirely possible to write about one. No, it doesn't provide anything informative about the spell, since what we want to know is what this thing is based on.
+:You're the one who created a section for "comments and suggestions". I am trying to dissuade any work that will end up being wasted, since it is no good for either of us - you use up all your time writing something that will be left unused, and become bitter, and I have to revert the edit, wasting my time. I am sorry about this, but it is true - by and large, what you've done here will be of no use to the wiki, and criticizing me as a person is not going to change that. You can either address the criticisms of your work, or continue to spend time railing against me, but that's your decision.[[User:KrytenKoro|<small>Glorious</small>]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>CHAOS!</small>]] 18:14, September 29, 2010 (UTC)