Talk:Removed content: Difference between revisions

lol reviving a dead thread I started 4 months ago
(→‎Terminology: new section)
(lol reviving a dead thread I started 4 months ago)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 217: Line 217:


Thats about it, thanks for coming to my tedtalk. {{User:UnknownChaser/Sig}} 16:15, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Thats about it, thanks for coming to my tedtalk. {{User:UnknownChaser/Sig}} 16:15, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
:I definitely agree that the current naming pattern makes no sense. That said, it might be cleaner to just have most files as '''Removed''' – regardless of if it was shown off, it still was planned for the game and subsequently cut. If we know what build of the game the content is from, then '''Demo''', '''Alpha''', or '''Beta''' would be appropriate, but I'm not sure what we gain from differentiating '''Unused''' and '''Removed'''.
:For instance, unique versions of both "Guardando nel buio" and "He's a Pirate" were found in the files of KHII, but since only one was refitted for the final game, they would be titled differently. Likewise, having both "Unused" and "Removed" stumbles when considering concept art and interviews about early content released after the game itself. It just seems easier to have it all under the "Removed" umbrella, especially since it's all going on [[Removed content]] and [[:Category:Removed content]] anyway. —[[User:Aid1043|<span style="font-family:'Times New Roman'; font-size:110%; color:#9932CC">Aid</span>]][[User talk:Aid1043|<span style="font-family:'Times New Roman'; font-size:110%; color:#9932CC">1043</span>]] 15:08, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
::Right, thats fine. Simplifying and Categorizing terms would be easier. So something like;
Beta - Media that were made, but '''change''' between revealed and final released.
Removed - Media that were made, but **not** used in the final product..
This should make everything easier to categorized. {{User:UnknownChaser/Sig}} 01:42, 29 November 2023 (UTC)