33,097
edits
Talk:Player (KHχ): Difference between revisions
→Male Player is canon
ShardofTruth (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
Dark Road ending depicts M Player with Ephemer in the flashback. IDK how much of connectivity DR has with UX where it reads your UX data or not to determined that cutscene. But based on the cutscene, M Player is the canon appearances of the character in the series, despite appearances of F Player in the game and I'm going by Fire Emblem logic with how both M/F Robin existing, but M Robin is the canon gender. So because of that, I'm suggesting Player should be using male pronouns in any articles regarding him. {{User:UnknownChaser/Sig}} 17:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC) | Dark Road ending depicts M Player with Ephemer in the flashback. IDK how much of connectivity DR has with UX where it reads your UX data or not to determined that cutscene. But based on the cutscene, M Player is the canon appearances of the character in the series, despite appearances of F Player in the game and I'm going by Fire Emblem logic with how both M/F Robin existing, but M Robin is the canon gender. So because of that, I'm suggesting Player should be using male pronouns in any articles regarding him. {{User:UnknownChaser/Sig}} 17:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC) | ||
:On the other hand, the DR ending goes conspicuously out of its way to avoid gendering Player – Xehanort describes every UX character as a "boy" or "girl", but describes Player as "another one" in the group. That, plus the fact that Xehanort's caretaker's face is always concealed in their blue robes, makes me believe that Player is still meant to be treated ambiguously. [[User:Aid1043|Aid1043]] ([[User talk:Aid1043|talk]]) 18:01, 31 August 2022 (UTC) | :On the other hand, the DR ending goes conspicuously out of its way to avoid gendering Player – Xehanort describes every UX character as a "boy" or "girl", but describes Player as "another one" in the group. That, plus the fact that Xehanort's caretaker's face is always concealed in their blue robes, makes me believe that Player is still meant to be treated ambiguously. [[User:Aid1043|Aid1043]] ([[User talk:Aid1043|talk]]) 18:01, 31 August 2022 (UTC) | ||
::Nomura said in the post-game interview that some scenes with the player could be misinterpreted and are subject to change in the announced 5.0.1 version. So this scene could very well be wrong in its current stage. I'd suggest to wait for this fix before declaring the male player canon since Aid1043 correctly pointed out how they tried to keep it vague in the past. --{{User:ShardofTruth/Sig}} 18:43, 31 August 2022 (UTC) | |||