347
edits
Talk:An Oath to Return: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
...I know I conceded the point in the moment, but on closer scrutiny "Nomura worked on XV before the rebranding" doesn't really make "true + false = Versus XIII" any more logical than "XIII = XIII". [[User:Draconai|Draconai]] ([[User talk:Draconai|talk]]) 04:37, 2 March 2020 (UTC) | ...I know I conceded the point in the moment, but on closer scrutiny "Nomura worked on XV before the rebranding" doesn't really make "true + false = Versus XIII" any more logical than "XIII = XIII". [[User:Draconai|Draconai]] ([[User talk:Draconai|talk]]) 04:37, 2 March 2020 (UTC) | ||
:You're.......not really getting it. Whatsoever. --[[User:Samoa Joe|Samoa Joe]] ([[User talk:Samoa Joe|talk]]) 04:49, 2 March 2020 (UTC) | :You're.......not really getting it. Whatsoever. --[[User:Samoa Joe|Samoa Joe]] ([[User talk:Samoa Joe|talk]]) 04:49, 2 March 2020 (UTC) | ||
You're assuming that the presence of the Latin words for both "true" and "false" is somehow a reference to the production name for XV. I don't see how that's any less of a leap than assuming the presence of the Roman numeral for thirteen is a reference to a game with the Roman numeral for XIII (which, I will reiterate, I mentioned as a theoretical comparison). Furthermore, you seem to be acting like (a) Nomura is the first person to reference an abandoned/reworked project in a later work, and (b) that there's anything wrong with so doing. [[User:Draconai|Draconai]] ([[User talk:Draconai|talk]]) 23:50, 2 March 2020 (UTC) | |||