14,549
edits
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) (→Retired: new section) |
|||
Line 150: | Line 150: | ||
#Do we want to have discussion on replacement admins, or just move up the current mods and elect replacements for them? | #Do we want to have discussion on replacement admins, or just move up the current mods and elect replacements for them? | ||
#Do we want to request bureaucracy for some of the current admins, so that in the future we don't have to wait on Bluerfn? I think BK and GS would be the best fit for that, if they want it.[[User:KrytenKoro|<small>Glorious</small>]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>CHAOS!</small>]] 23:33, May 27, 2010 (UTC) | #Do we want to request bureaucracy for some of the current admins, so that in the future we don't have to wait on Bluerfn? I think BK and GS would be the best fit for that, if they want it.[[User:KrytenKoro|<small>Glorious</small>]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>CHAOS!</small>]] 23:33, May 27, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I think we should see how we are doing when the time comes; based on what little vandalism we already get, I do not think that creating more administrators would be necessary. Let's just wait until the time comes for this one, methinks. However, I don't support the movement of a regular user up to an administrator without first becoming a moderator, since moderators are part of a "path-like" hierarchy toward adminship. | |||
:Secondly, that sounds great, as long as the receiving administrators are active and available at the time. --{{User:DoorToNothing/Sig}} 23:52, May 27, 2010 (UTC) |
edits