14,961
edits
Forum:New image policy on new wiki: Difference between revisions
God bless our new image policy
No edit summary |
(God bless our new image policy) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|The World that Never was}} | {{Forumheader|The Realm of Sleep|The World that Never was}} | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{ErryTalk|time=02:36, January 31, 2011 (UTC)|saix=I propose that in the new wiki after we successfully move to the Kingdom Hearts DB that we put in a new image policy that every filetype of image must be either .png or .gif because I find it a big pain when I want to remove the background of an image and then only to find that the original image is .jpg and have to upload an entirely new file, that clutters up the image category. Both .png and .gif support transparent backgrounds, however .jpg does not and it has horrible compression. So, what do you think?}} | {{ErryTalk|time=02:36, January 31, 2011 (UTC)|saix=I propose that in the new wiki after we successfully move to the Kingdom Hearts DB that we put in a new image policy that every filetype of image must be either .png or .gif because I find it a big pain when I want to remove the background of an image and then only to find that the original image is .jpg and have to upload an entirely new file, that clutters up the image category. Both .png and .gif support transparent backgrounds, however .jpg does not and it has horrible compression. So, what do you think?}} | ||
{{Maggosh|nathan=I completely agree.}} | {{Maggosh|nathan=I completely agree.}} | ||
{{LA|Vtext=I think it is an excellent idea, Erry, only I'm worried about how easy it will be to moderate... I mean, it can't be exactly a walk in the park to sort through hundreds up images and distinguish whether they are the correct file extension, and then move them, can it?}} | |||
{{The Inexistent|com='''I also agree. I fully support this idea, although, as previously stated, this will be extremely hard to moderate. In addition, the majority of the lead images and screenshots currently being used ARE jpg. to replace these will take an extremely long time, and the deletion of the superseded files would take monthes (look in the articles for deletion, most of them have been there for monthes, and still remain in existence).'''}} | |||
{{Lilienne|time=23:24, January 31, 2011 (UTC)|text=2¢...It sounds good, but I agree it would be a pain to sort through the images.}} | |||
{{17m|ezio= What about the original .jpg files? Should they be deleted?}} | |||
{{KrytenKoro|They should be marked for deletion, certainly, but not deleted until they are replaced across the wiki.}} | |||
{{ErryTalk|time=14:59, February 1, 2011 (UTC)|saix=To add onto what Kryten said, any .jpg images that can be converted to .png or .gif and are of good use will stay, however redundant ones will be deleted.}} | |||
{{ShardofTruth|time=02:33, February 2, 2011 (UTC)|talk=I agree, that would be best. | |||
I have another thing I want to talk about though: image dimensions. Most all of you may noticed, that there were some uploads of ridiculous large images (1000px-2000px) in the past months, which are made avaible on some sites (I think there are mostly press material). There are two things, that bother me about them: | |||
1. We never use images wider than 400px here (with the exception of the BBS timeline), because the templates and now even the site itself are not suited for bigger images. So there are just resized and therefore the big resolution is useless. | |||
2. The quality of these images is in almost every case very poor, because they are highly compressed jpgs. Which leads to another problem: the cutting from the gray background that is used nearly every time as well. The borders of the images are so blurred it's not 100% possible to get it right, that's why most of the large images look rather horrible if you look at them in their original size. So they are ugly as well. | |||
The solution for both problems is easy: Cut the image and then smooth and resize them, so the ugly borders can not be seen.}} | |||