Forum:New forum proposal - "Heartless Manufactory": Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Forum:New forum proposal - "Heartless Manufactory" (edit)

Revision as of 15:02, 14 May 2014

4,901 bytes added , 9 years ago

m

clean up

KHWikiBot

Bots

25,928

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{Forumheader|The World that Never was}}
+{{Forumheader|The Realm of Sleep|The World that Never was}}
-{{sticky}}
 <!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ -->
@@ Line 40: / Line 39: @@
 {{Asif|sho=I like this idea.  It's better then constantly handing out warnings, and it'll help the wiki too.
-And as for the name, I like "Heartless Manufactory", but I think that calling it "The Door to Darkness" would fit to, considering it takes two keys to seal it.}}
+And as for the name, I like "Heartless Manufactory", but I think that calling it "The Door to Darkness" would fit too, considering it takes two keys to seal it.}}
 {{MM841|12:17, 19 February 2011 (EST)|Sounds like a good idea.}}
+{{KKD|time=13:58, 19 February 2011 (EST)|link=Me likey. Sounds good to me.}}
+{{CaelumLucisCaliga|time=15:06, 19 February 2011 (EST)|basic=sounds interesting. Nice. :)}}
+{{Dan da Man36|time=15:20, 19 February 2011 (EST)|happy=Sounds good to me. "Heartless Manufactory" sound alright for a name, but I must say, I do like As if's suggestion about the "Door to Darkness" name.}}
+{{Mechajin|time=[[User:Mechajin|Mechajin]] 15:32, 19 February 2011 (EST)|text=I think that this is a brilliant idea! I think that "The Door to Darkness" is a better name, because opening/closing it requires cooperation just like this will!}}
+{{LevL|time=15:52, 19 February 2011 (EST)|text=This sounds like a good idea to me.}}
+{{RoxasNobody|time=15:58, 19 February 2011 (EST)|text=Sounds good, but "Door to Darkness" does sound a little better.}}
+{{ErryTalk|time=16:25, 19 February 2011 (EST)|saix=I'm all up for this. Don't really care what it's named, but it seems good.}}
+{{FinalRest|time=17:46, 19 February 2011 (EST)|text=I do like this idea, but I have a question:
+What happens if one user refuses to go to the manufactory? For example I've seen a few instances where there has been a conflict between a 'veteran' editor and a newbie and they have been told to stop only to have the newbie snap back and tell everyone to f*** off because this wiki sucks and blah blah blah. If the 'veteran' were to say 'Hey, okay I don't want that warning. Lets go to the manufactory and make up.' and the newbie said ' whatever I don't need you. Your warnings mean nothing etc.' what would happen to the editor that wanted to wipe the slate clean? Would they be given the chance to redeem themselves alone?}}
+Well, then they will keep the warnings.  The other half who are willing to participate, on the other hand, will most likely be able to hook up with another person who either wishes to help, or had another noob who doesn't want to help.  {{The Inexistentsig}} 17:50, 20 February 2011 (EST)
+:To be fair, a lot of the problem is arseholes like me who delight in passive aggression (or outright aggression, as the case may be).
+:However, if the second user refuses to go to the manufactory...I guess the first can still go. However, one of the main points of this idea is not just "to be like prison", but to force the two offenders to see how helpful the other can be. That doesn't work so well when it's just two random people. However, as long as it is a much rarer and last resort scenario, being paired up with someone unrelated can be an option.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 22:24, 20 February 2011 (EST)
+{{Chitalian8|time=22:52, 20 February 2011 (EST)|text= Looks like a sound idea. I'm good with the name. But if there are repeated offenders, i.e. people who constantly bash other users, would they be allowed to go to the Manufactory as many times as they want, and we'd let all of their offenses slide? Or is there a limit to how many warnings you can drop?}}
+{{KrytenKoro|Again, once you complete a trip to the Manufactory, ''your offense never happened''. Nobody jags you for it, it isn't used against you in any way, and the warning is erased from your talk page.}}
+{{R&D|time=15:20, 22 February 2011 (EST)|happy=Can I go first!? *shot*
+<s>Like I ever was a bashful user <.<</s> *shot again*
+Okay... enough... I like the idea very much!
+And both names are okay, but may I propose I third one? "Castle Oblivion". I know there wasn't much Co-oping in CoM but Castle Oblivion would fit as a name since it involves "erasing memories" (in this case, offenses), it takes two people (a Sora and a Riku. Or a Riku and a Mickey.. or whatever) and a third one to choose a task (Naminé and DiZ anyone?)<br>
+But, whatever.
+Again, great idea.}}
+I concur completely. Nice job. ^_^--[[User:Xion4ever|<span style="color:black">''Xion''</span>]][[User talk:Xion4ever|<span style="color:darkred">''4''</span>]][[User:Xion4ever/Atelier|<span style="color:maroon">''ever''</span>]] 18:44, 26 February 2011 (EST)
+I agree with KrytenKoro, as well.--{{User:NinjaSheik/Sig}} 15:53, 5 March 2011 (EST)
+{{CaelumLucisCaliga|time=15:04, 11 March 2011 (EST)|skinny=so when are we getting this show on the road?}}
+{{KrytenKoro|It ''IS'' on the road. As soon as somebody gets a warning for personal attacks, we can do our first run-through.}}
+{{Asif|sho=I think what he means is... when are we going to create the actual forum?  You know, with a header and link from the forum page.}}
+{{Chitalian8|time=21:52, 11 March 2011 (EST)|talk= Thing is, As if, there's no real troublemakers here yet. Therefore, there's no point in making the new forum and letting it collect dust until we get some bad behavior here. We don't even show up on Google, of course trolls and troublemakers aren't gonna show up.}}
+{{Asif|shonormal=What about that guy who keeps spamming the wiki? (Don't worry; I know what you mean.)}}
+{{KrytenKoro|That's a bot.}}