14,549
edits
Forum:ErryK as an OP: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
LightRoxas (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 198: | Line 198: | ||
:I second the motion. For real, and for ''all'' the reasons I and everyone else stated above. <sup>'''[[User:Troisnyxetienne|<font color="#4997D0">Tambours</font>]]'''</sup><sub>'''[[User talk:Troisnyxetienne|<font color="#191970">Néant</font>]]'''</sub> '''[[User:Troisnyxetienne/Mensa|<font color="silver">Ensemble !</font>]]''' 23:42, 8 October 2011 (UTC) | :I second the motion. For real, and for ''all'' the reasons I and everyone else stated above. <sup>'''[[User:Troisnyxetienne|<font color="#4997D0">Tambours</font>]]'''</sup><sub>'''[[User talk:Troisnyxetienne|<font color="#191970">Néant</font>]]'''</sub> '''[[User:Troisnyxetienne/Mensa|<font color="silver">Ensemble !</font>]]''' 23:42, 8 October 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Re-op him. Just end it now before any other ridiculous arguments happen. {{User:LightRoxas/Sig}} 01:24, 9 October 2011 (UTC) | :Re-op him. Just end it now before any other ridiculous arguments happen. {{User:LightRoxas/Sig}} 01:24, 9 October 2011 (UTC) | ||
::In case it wasn't clearly obvious, it's been a month without any disagreeing replies to my Godtext. As far as I know, this has been interpreted as agreement and an inability to ''dis''agree with the information presented. The sheer fact that there are users who support ErryK getting his channel operator privileges without having even commented or replies to the Godtext shows ignorance and/or weakness of justification. My decision on the matter stands, and I don't think another Godtext is required to make that clear. --{{User:DoorToNothing/Sig}} 04:40, 9 October 2011 (UTC) | |||