21,449
edits
Forum:ErryK as an OP: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
LapisScarab (talk | contribs) (Huzzah! Power back.) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Coming from the same place as Shard here, since I'm never really on the IRC, but going by the log Erry wasn't being unprofessional at all. He made a vague critique of another site. ...So? He wasn't cursing and he wasn't naming names. {{User:LapisScarab/Sig}}20:13, 28 August 2011 (UTC) | Coming from the same place as Shard here, since I'm never really on the IRC, but going by the log Erry wasn't being unprofessional at all. He made a vague critique of another site. ...So? He wasn't cursing and he wasn't naming names. {{User:LapisScarab/Sig}}20:13, 28 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
{{neumannz|time=20:54, 28 August 2011 (UTC)|angry=My take: "Unprofessional" accurately describes what went on there. Erry should have moved off of the topic when he was asked. The whole channel-silence business and op/de-op warring was demented and shouldn't have happened, and between the three of you, no one did what you should have done, which was either to back off completely or to take it off-channel. | |||
If there was really more to this, as DTN said, then we'll deal with it when he gets in. At this point, though, I'm definitely not happy with how anybody acted.}} | |||