33,103
edits
Forum:The Icon Situation: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Chitalian8 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
ShardofTruth (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
{{Chitalian8|time=23:41, 16 September 2015 (UTC)|sad= Yeah, the thing with pop-up menus is that they can be weird for other browsers/hardware, as Kryten and Webber have both noted, which is the main drawback. In this case that this is too major of an issue, I default back to my original idea.}} | {{Chitalian8|time=23:41, 16 September 2015 (UTC)|sad= Yeah, the thing with pop-up menus is that they can be weird for other browsers/hardware, as Kryten and Webber have both noted, which is the main drawback. In this case that this is too major of an issue, I default back to my original idea.}} | ||
== Part 0.2 -A fragmentary continuation-== | |||
So we're basically still were we started, same with the naming policy (see [[:Forum:HD screenshot naming policy|here]]), but using the wiki the last months I've leaned more and more to Kryten's opinion. All this HD categorization doesn't make thing clearer, it just gets worse. | |||
So I propose to remove the 1.5 and 2.5 icons and replace them with the actual game's icon in case the content is exclusive to the HD remasters and go with the "new title ==> new game page" kind of rule, which essentially means more footnotes. Same for the crazy HD naming policy because with the "aboutfile" template there is a convenient place to explain the origin of a file as detailed as desired and if for whatever reason a difference should be made more clear there is always [[:File:Darkness Released 01 KHRECOM.png|this method]]. | |||
It's obviously not a perfect solution, but it's much simpler to use. So what do you think, anyone for or against this? We could also vote if everyone already made up their mind. --{{User:ShardofTruth/Sig}} 13:03, 20 June 2016 (UTC) | |||