7,364
edits
KHWiki talk:Roundtable: Difference between revisions
→Reschedule: ROUNDTABLE TODAY AT 7:00 UTC
Chitalian8 (talk | contribs) |
(→Reschedule: ROUNDTABLE TODAY AT 7:00 UTC) |
||
| (22 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
::::Well we need to figure out something that works. Not just anything and stick with it... that'd be absolutely pointless. {{User:Erry/Sig}} 10:42, 4 October 2011 (UTC) | ::::Well we need to figure out something that works. Not just anything and stick with it... that'd be absolutely pointless. {{User:Erry/Sig}} 10:42, 4 October 2011 (UTC) | ||
:::::How about one for the Western time zone, and one for the Eastern time zone? The meeting starts at 3 O'clock in the morning at my place, I certainly can't show up every time there's a meeting :/ {{User:17master/Sign}} 11:09, 4 October 2011 (UTC) | :::::How about one for the Western time zone, and one for the Eastern time zone? The meeting starts at 3 O'clock in the morning at my place, I certainly can't show up every time there's a meeting :/ {{User:17master/Sign}} 11:09, 4 October 2011 (UTC) | ||
::::::Two separate meetings would be | ::::::Two separate meetings would be too chaotic. Different agreements would be reached by both meetings, and in the end, we'd just be coming back together again. So no to that idea. {{User:Chitalian8/Sig}} 11:24, 4 October 2011 (UTC) | ||
:::::::asdfghjkl;' you're right though. What about Friday night (which is probably Saturday early for me)? {{User:17master/Sign}} 11:41, 4 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
:::Friday night's as bad as Saturday for me. Look, we can't possibly find a time that works for everyone, so the best we can do is use a day that works for many, and those of us who can't make it can either leave messages on this talk page or with someone who ''will'' be making it to the roundtable. That's the best we can do. --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 14:38, 4 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
==November 5th== | |||
{{LapisScarab|time=22:45, 23 October 2011 (UTC)|text=I will not be able to attend the Nov. 5th meeting. So: | |||
#I don't have any real opinion. | |||
#I'm not clear on the full story, but I think Erry should be re-opped.}} | |||
The third night of the musical is on the 5th, so... | |||
#<s>Seeing as we've brought this topic up, like many others, twenty times before...</s> Don't care. | |||
#Yes, because, when the forum was refreshed, the ''only'' person who wanted Erry to stay de'op'd was DTN. The ''only'' person. {{The Inexistentsig}} 02:14, 30 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
==December Meeting== | |||
{{LapisScarab|time=23:39, 21 November 2011 (UTC)|text=Okay, I was going to wait until the actual meeting date, but I just can't anymore. The main reason I brought up that agenda piece was to say that, sadly, I am going to go inactive. There's just too much stuff going on in my personal life right now, too many distractions (college apps, school, etc.). Conversely, there just isn't enough going on on the Wiki for me to participate in right now. I just don't have anything to do other than dealing with the Mirage Arena Nominations, and I think we can all agree I've not been particularly good at that. With so little going on I can help with, there's no point in me continuing to check-in as I have been doing. I'm basically just dead weight at this point, and it would be better for the Wiki in general if I went inactive. So... yeah. I still get emailed when my talk page is edited, so if I'm needed badly, I should at least get the message, but I won't be checking in regularly anymore. | |||
I love this place and all of you guys, this Wiki has given me a sense of fulfillment I honestly don't get very often in the rest of my life. I hope I'll be able to come back soon, but as it is now, I'll see you all when I see you. So long.}} | |||
:Seeing as Lapis has started this, I'll say my bit too. | |||
:Also, don't be offended if I never seem to say "you'll be missed" on things like this... mostly because I know most of the people are coming back anyway. | |||
:I recently moved ENX to inactive. However, he quickly moved himself back to active. My reasoning: | |||
::No edits for nearly a month (at the time of the switch). | |||
::I checked his IP account, and it has... two edits, I believe? | |||
:Yes, he has made great contributions, and yes, he may check on the wiki often. However, that is technically ''inactive''. <small>And there shouldn't be much of an argument to begin with... I specified when I remodelled the page the distinction between "Inactive" and "Retired".</small> | |||
:What I'm about to say will most certainly be taken the wrong way. However, it was the best analogy I could think of that was both realistic and reasonable. | |||
:If I define myself as not being annoying and irratable, yet am still the most annoying person in existence, am I annoying? Most certainly. If I define myself as active, yet appear to be inactive, and evidence supports this, am I active? Most likely not. So, yeah. ENX, however is back. And, no, this has nothing to actually do with ENX in particular, it's just that this incident summoned a response. {{The Inexistentsig}} 01:19, 22 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
==August Meeting== | |||
I will not be able to atend because of my course, but I got my 3DS XL yesterday, so I can help and check more info now. - {{User:MateusinhoEX/SigTemplate}} 12:35, 2 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
==Just now realized something...== | |||
The naming policy we came up for the COM talk sprites doesn't solve the problem. We came up with: "File:Character (Emotion) # GAME.png" however, it should be "File:Character (Talk sprite) # GAME.png". The whole point of discussing the COM sprites was to eliminate the battle between having "emotion" in the title or not. Under what we decided today, we fixed only half the problem. I take full responsibility for this error, and ask for a "revote" on the new naming method previously listed. Obviously I'm for Neumannz's method [Character (Talk sprite) # GAME.png] - {{User:Xion4ever/Sig}} 00:05, 5 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Reschedule == | |||
It appears as of late that 7:00 PM UTC is not a convenient time to hold the Roundtable for almost anyone. Neumannz and I were talking about it last night, and we agreed that it's just not working for most anyone. In fact, Neumannz won't be able to attend any of the meetings in the next couple months unless the meeting is moved. And everyone else, they tend not to be around on the wiki on Fridays at 7:00 UTC. So, with that in mind, I think we should consider moving the Roundtable to a time that fits all, or at least, fits a little better to most people. Here's what I've gathered as far as when we can't do it: | |||
*Not past 7:00 PM UTC, as that is late for any editors in England and most of Europe. | |||
*Not between Friday 7:00 PM UTC and Saturday 9:00 PM UTC, as that's when Neumannz will be unavailable | |||
Perhaps a weekday might work, as I notice most people are on the IRC during the weekdays. What do you guys think? {{KeybladeSpyMaster/Sig}} 17:20, 9 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
Perhaps a Saturday night would work better? Although that would mean I couldn't come, but how does everybody feel about it? {{User:Chainoffire/sig}} 18:37, 9 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
Sounds perfect for me. {{User:Master Riku the Bloody/Sig1}} 18:39, 9 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
:The old time Saturday 9pm UTC worked okay before. I forgot why we changed it in the first place... {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 18:44, 9 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
I need to make a correction: I'm unavailable between Friday 9:00 PM UTC (4 PM EST) and Saturday 11:00 PM UTC (6 PM EST). After that time on Sat. night is fine for me. --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 21:08, 9 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
Trying to get this rescheduled again. Please take [https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1jY6G4LgFGN2EhNGg1IBUhC0Cy08NiimzXDAq9K---bk/viewform?usp=send_form this survey] to help figure out when most users are available for the Roundtable. {{KeybladeSpyMaster/Sig}} 23:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
:Ok, after a little editing, adjusting, and having to recreate it elsewhere, the survey is now hosted on Google Docs. Please, guys, we need everyone to take this survey so that we can figure out the best time to have the Roundtable. Thanks! {{KeybladeSpyMaster/Sig}} 00:07, 15 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
Ok, I've gathered 8 responses, and from those eight responses, I've put together a few recommendations on when we should host the Roundtable, from most popular time/day: | |||
#'''Wednesday 18:00 UTC''': While Wednesday was not necessarily the most popular day, the specific time of Wednesday 6:00 PM UTC was. | |||
#'''Friday 18:00 UTC''': Friday was the most popular day. The time slot of 6:00 PM and 11:00 PM UTC was the most popular. In fact, more people were consistently available every hour between 6:00 PM UTC and 11:00 PM UTC Friday than on any other day. That consistent activity actually goes through 3:00 AM Saturday. This change would move the Roundtable earlier by an hour. | |||
#'''Any Weekday 18:00 UTC to 21:00 UTC''': The other weekdays are not as popular as Wednesday or Friday, but the same time slot was the most popular over any other one. | |||
Anyways, that's my findings. I don't know if you guys want to move the Roundtable to any of these suggestions, since there were only eight responses shaping these recommendations. {{KeybladeSpyMaster/Sig}} 17:02, 3 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
==March Roundtable 2015== | |||
By now, we may as well skip March and carry the agenda items over to April. It's only a week later. Thoughts? {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 19:07, 24 March 2015 (UTC) | |||