Talk:100 Acre Wood: Difference between revisions

Line 124: Line 124:
Honestly, I don't see the need to merge two perfectly decent articles into one long, slightly muddled ones. The two articles should link to each other via a "See Also" section. {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 19:46, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Honestly, I don't see the need to merge two perfectly decent articles into one long, slightly muddled ones. The two articles should link to each other via a "See Also" section. {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 19:46, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
:Hmm. Technically, the torn pages are a part of the old book. As such, it makes sense to combine the two. I'm not sure how we will combine the two smoothly, though. {{User:Xion4ever/Sig}} 01:24, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
:Hmm. Technically, the torn pages are a part of the old book. As such, it makes sense to combine the two. I'm not sure how we will combine the two smoothly, though. {{User:Xion4ever/Sig}} 01:24, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
::If we were to merge the two together, we'd probably merge the lead of Torn Pages into the old book's lead and then add a "Location" section for the torn pages. However, I wouldn't be sure what to do to include both key items into the one infobox. {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 15:51, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
10,134

edits