33,103
edits
Forum:Art Transparency: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
ShardofTruth (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
Shard you know more about images than I do, are you saying we need to revert all of his recent uploads? That's what it sounds like to me. You're the image expert, I agree with whatever you decide.}} | Shard you know more about images than I do, are you saying we need to revert all of his recent uploads? That's what it sounds like to me. You're the image expert, I agree with whatever you decide.}} | ||
{{ShardofTruth|time=20:41, 16 June 2014 (UTC)|talk=After rethinking the whole matter yesterday, I'm not for an uniform policy for concept arts/artworks.<br> | |||
We are not an art gallery here (at least that's what I'm telling myself), when it comes down to it, it's all about the respective pages. From my point of view it often helps the flow of an article if some images are cropped, mirrored or made with a transparent background. You could always argue that editing an image takes something away from it, an purist would most likely only prefer them on high contrast backgrounds without touching them at all. I'm still against taking something away from an artwork (like the blue underground in the [[:File:Throne (Art).png|Throne]] artwork) and that some of the sketchiest concept arts make more sense on a white background while the rest can work better here when used like the rest of the images.<br> | |||
If there is really dispute over some of the artworks we can still talk about it, it's not like we have hundreds of them. For the record, we currently use full cropped artworks (like [[:File:Card (Art).png|this]]), half cropped (like [[:File:Sea (Art).png|this]]) and some with full white backgrounds.}} | |||