10,134
edits
User talk:Neumannz: Difference between revisions
→Magazine
| Line 1,261: | Line 1,261: | ||
Have you managed to make any progress on your art by any chance? {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 15:55, 7 April 2016 (UTC) | Have you managed to make any progress on your art by any chance? {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 15:55, 7 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
:Well, my computer decided to do a Windows update that lasted over two days, but i'm just about done. With luck I should have it for you tonight. --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 18:50, 7 April 2016 (UTC) | :Well, my computer decided to do a Windows update that lasted over two days, but i'm just about done. With luck I should have it for you tonight. --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 18:50, 7 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
::That's great! {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 21:49, 7 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Shockwave > Shock Wave == | == Shockwave > Shock Wave == | ||
Can you perform "shockwave" to "shock wave" and "Shockwave" to "Shock Wave" with AWB? Or the other way around. Do we have any kind of in-canon support for which parsing is preferred? I think the term is used in the [[Bruiser]]'s report entry, as "shock wave", but from our notes, the command descriptions in BbS and DDD use "shockwave". Can't confirm the command descriptions at the moment, tho.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 20:43, 17 March 2016 (UTC) | Can you perform "shockwave" to "shock wave" and "Shockwave" to "Shock Wave" with AWB? Or the other way around. Do we have any kind of in-canon support for which parsing is preferred? I think the term is used in the [[Bruiser]]'s report entry, as "shock wave", but from our notes, the command descriptions in BbS and DDD use "shockwave". Can't confirm the command descriptions at the moment, tho.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 20:43, 17 March 2016 (UTC) | ||