53,710
edits
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) |
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 163: | Line 163: | ||
:Evidence about the possibility of the off-chance pertaining to the once-in-a-blue-moon-er moment... [[User:Maggosh|mag]][[User talk:Maggosh|gosh]] 13:25, 10 October 2012 (UTC) | :Evidence about the possibility of the off-chance pertaining to the once-in-a-blue-moon-er moment... [[User:Maggosh|mag]][[User talk:Maggosh|gosh]] 13:25, 10 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
:No, you did not present any evidence for an alternative. You're not arguing it could be a definite other person, you're arguing evidence of existence from absence, which is pointless if not exactly false. | :No, you did not present any evidence for an alternative. You're not arguing it could be a definite other person, you're arguing evidence of existence from absence, which is pointless if not exactly false. | ||
:as for coverage: reread what I said. THIS character appeared, with a visual depiction and everything. If you believe he should not be treated as implicitly the replica, then give me a page title you think I should move his coverage to.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 20: | :as for coverage: reread what I said. THIS character appeared, with a visual depiction and everything. If you believe he should not be treated as implicitly the replica, then give me a page title you think I should move his coverage to.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 20:18, 10 October 2012 (UTC) |
edits