Talk:Armor of Eraqus: Difference between revisions

→‎Invincibility: new section
(→‎Invincibility: new section)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 65: Line 65:
:I can't accept this, of all new translations and re-translation done for 1.5 & 2.5 this one has to be the worst. {{User:ShardofTruth/Sig}} 18:35, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
:I can't accept this, of all new translations and re-translation done for 1.5 & 2.5 this one has to be the worst. {{User:ShardofTruth/Sig}} 18:35, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Agreed. It's just silly.  --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 18:50, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Agreed. It's just silly.  --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 18:50, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
:So we're rejecting a name for being silly? Whatever happened to using official English translations? Do you plan to keep that [[Template:Translation|Translation]] template up forever? Yeah, I know the English translations haven't had perfect track records. I mean, who else remembers the names of Ansem's apprentices? But those were honest mistranslations that were later fixed. No matter which way I look at it, this is more a deliberate name change. And if we're not going to be acknowledging this change, then I guess we'd might as well change [[Royal Radiance]] and [[Master's Defender]] back. [[User:Immblueversion|Immblueversion]] ([[User talk:Immblueversion|talk]]) 15:46, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
:So we're rejecting a name for being silly? Whatever happened to using official English translations? Doesn't the [[Manual of Style]] state that each article must share the official name of its subject? Do you plan to keep that [[Template:Translation|Translation]] template up forever? Yeah, I know the English translations haven't had perfect track records. I mean, who else remembers the names of Ansem's apprentices? But those were honest mistranslations that were later fixed. No matter which way I look at it, this is more a deliberate name change. And if we're not going to be acknowledging this change, then I guess we'd might as well change things such as [[Critical Impact]], [[Spellweaver]], [[Royal Radiance]] and [[Master's Defender]] back. That, and I honestly see nothing wrong with the name "Armor of Eraqus" because, well, it's Eraqus's armor. The armor of the Master. Otherwise, I'll just get a confirmation on the enemy's Journal entry. [[User:Immblueversion|Immblueversion]] ([[User talk:Immblueversion|talk]]) 15:46, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
We're not really saying we're not gonna use it, we are, we have to, it's our policy, we just think it's a ridiculous choice on the part of the localization team, and we choose to NEVER BE HAPPY ABOUT IT EVER.
 
But yeah, we are going to move it, don't worry. Just let us have our hissy fit.  --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 15:53, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
:As Neumannz said, this page will be moved. A screenshot or linked video of the journal entry (along with No Heart and Monstro) would still be nice though. --{{User:ShardofTruth/Sig}} 18:28, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
 
::Truth be told, you're all taking this much better than certain other Wikis I'm familiar with. I still can't get over how stubborn admins can get. In the meantime, I'm doing everything in my limited power to get the proper info. [[User:Immblueversion|Immblueversion]] ([[User talk:Immblueversion|talk]]) 19:22, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
 
== Invincibility ==
 
In the 2.5 ReMIX version at least, I'm noticing a lot of times when my attacks aren't dealing damage to him. Are there any particular triggers that make him invincible for periods of time and how do you stop making him invincible (other than waiting)? {{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} 21:21, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
10,134

edits