23,123
edits
Forum:Etymology and Appearances: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
{{TNE|time=05:13, October 30, 2009 (UTC)|text=Let's see... if there are extensive details about the appearance, like what the [[Grim Reaper]] would have (references to an Inca god), then it's something worth mentioning. Otherwise, I don't think so... if there are only a few things about the appearance to say, then they should go onto the introduction.}} | {{TNE|time=05:13, October 30, 2009 (UTC)|text=Let's see... if there are extensive details about the appearance, like what the [[Grim Reaper]] would have (references to an Inca god), then it's something worth mentioning. Otherwise, I don't think so... if there are only a few things about the appearance to say, then they should go onto the introduction.}} | ||
{{DTN|time=05:15, October 30, 2009 (UTC)|text=Like I said before, appearance information for Heartless and Nobodies is usually so simple that it is insufficent to have an "Appearance" section. I suggest that we wait for the thoughts of KrytenKoro, since he is the one who sent LapisScarab here. Plus, he started this topic, so probably has the most detailed outlook. Ping?}} | {{DTN|time=05:15, October 30, 2009 (UTC)|text=Like I said before, appearance information for Heartless and Nobodies is usually so simple that it is insufficent to have an "Appearance" section. I suggest that we wait for the thoughts of KrytenKoro, since he is the one who sent LapisScarab here. Plus, he started this topic, so probably has the most detailed outlook. Ping?}} | ||
{{TNE|time=05:17, October 30, 2009 (UTC)|happytext=Yep, ping ! ^_^}} | |||