53,710
edits
No edit summary |
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
And finally, there's the issue of attacks that aren't one-against-one from the beginning. If one editor attacks another, but the recipient doesn't retaliate, do we still have them doing a docket together? The recipient won't even warrant a WarningPA, right? --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 02:32, 18 April 2011 (EDT) | And finally, there's the issue of attacks that aren't one-against-one from the beginning. If one editor attacks another, but the recipient doesn't retaliate, do we still have them doing a docket together? The recipient won't even warrant a WarningPA, right? --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 02:32, 18 April 2011 (EDT) | ||
:Right, but they generally do occur in pairs.....hmm. | |||
:Obviously, having the two offenders work together is by far preferable. In the absence of consent from both parties, it seems that we should allow single-party dockets. | |||
:But again, what of the missing offender? If he comes back, do we have him do a single ticket? Wouldn't that allow people to just work on their own, instead of getting the lesson? Do we want to inflict a harsher punishment for deciding not to work with your assigned partner?{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 04:20, 18 April 2011 (EDT) |
edits