User talk:TheSilentHero: Difference between revisions

Line 98: Line 98:
::Thank you! I would like my new username to be Nightsilver.<span style="color:silver; font-style:italic;font-family:Times New Roman; text-shadow: 1px 1px 1px MidnightBlue;">The Silver wings of night</span> 19:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
::Thank you! I would like my new username to be Nightsilver.<span style="color:silver; font-style:italic;font-family:Times New Roman; text-shadow: 1px 1px 1px MidnightBlue;">The Silver wings of night</span> 19:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
:::Done. Please make sure to follow our [[KHWiki:Signature Policy|Signature policy]]. {{User:TheSilentHero/Sig}} 21:00, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
:::Done. Please make sure to follow our [[KHWiki:Signature Policy|Signature policy]]. {{User:TheSilentHero/Sig}} 21:00, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
== Let's have a quick talk ==
Hi.
<br>
So, you obviously saw my edit summary deleting my talk page. Believe me when I say that I ''get'' it's a rule. That said, I reiterate that that isn't particularly a concern of mine when it comes to this. As someone with moderating experience elsewhere (not necessarily on a fan wiki), I have to pose the question, and I ask sincerely - can you consider using discretion to cast aside "typical procedure", for lack of a better term, if in fact, such a thing has no value?
<br>
I realize it's a big ask to place your trust in me when I explain that I've come here after nearly a decade of inactivity (feel free to check my contributions) with the sole intent of tying some loose ends and erasing some embarrassments from my childhood. Or maybe you can believe that and you don't really care. But naturally, the question that pops up is this: what benefit does it give an independently run Kingdom Hearts fan wiki to retain old talk page messages from someone who was a child at the time (and really should not have had an account here), and what would it lose in terms of serving its purpose - IE, a collection of information on Kingdom Hearts - if a talk page maybe five or six people in the world are aware exists? One of whom is actively bothered by its existence as a reminder of a time I was acting as a petulant child.
<br>
Of course, I will defer to your decision if you decide that everything must be played exactly by the book, to the letter of the law. I could go on some rambling essay begging for some jury nullification, but the only other thing I'll say is that in my experience, it's often just as much, if not more, of a meaningful but weighted decision to be made when you choose whether a rule, however large or small, can be overlooked on rare occasion.
<br>
As I said, whatever decision you make, I'll abide by that. I hope your day finds you well.
<br>
Mar 20:06, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
299

edits