Forum:ErryK as an OP: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 197: Line 197:
Because it is continually brought up, I'm reviving this discussion.  Should Erry be reop'd?  I say yes, and to save us the trouble, DTN says no.  Please discuss below.  {{The Inexistentsig}} 23:31, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Because it is continually brought up, I'm reviving this discussion.  Should Erry be reop'd?  I say yes, and to save us the trouble, DTN says no.  Please discuss below.  {{The Inexistentsig}} 23:31, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
:I second the motion. For real, and for ''all'' the reasons I and everyone else stated above. <sup>'''[[User:Troisnyxetienne|<font color="#4997D0">Tambours</font>]]'''</sup><sub>'''[[User talk:Troisnyxetienne|<font color="#191970">Néant</font>]]'''</sub> '''[[User:Troisnyxetienne/Mensa|<font color="silver">Ensemble !</font>]]''' 23:42, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
:I second the motion. For real, and for ''all'' the reasons I and everyone else stated above. <sup>'''[[User:Troisnyxetienne|<font color="#4997D0">Tambours</font>]]'''</sup><sub>'''[[User talk:Troisnyxetienne|<font color="#191970">Néant</font>]]'''</sub> '''[[User:Troisnyxetienne/Mensa|<font color="silver">Ensemble !</font>]]''' 23:42, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
:Re-op him. Just end it now before any other ridiculous arguments happen. {{User:LightRoxas/Sig}} 01:24, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
1,723

edits